- From: Thomas Baker <thomas.baker@bi.fhg.de>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:10:02 +0100
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:01:16PM -0000, Alistair Miles wrote: > (reposting this with helpful subject line) > > Mark wrote: > > I was wondering about the difference between skos:scopeNote and > > skos:definition (and also editorialNote/changeNote). Thesauri > > in the ISO > > 2788 format only have a scope note (i.e. the scope note is the > > definition). Their difference may become clearer if an example > > containing both a scope note and a definition is included. > > Also, people > > migrating from an ISO thesaurus need to be aware that their ScopeNotes > > should probably be migrated to skos:definition. > > The intention is that a definition is a 'statement or formal explanation of > the meaning of a concept' (i.e. is supposed to be a *complete* explanation > of the meaning of the concept) whereas a scope note is a 'note that helps to > clarify the meaning of a concept' (i.e. a statement of what the meaning of > the concept includes or does not include, but not a complete explanation of > the meaning of a concept). In other words, a 'scope note' says something > about what is 'in or out of scope' for a particular concept. A definition > is supposed to describe (fully) the 'scope' of a concept. > > This means that, if a concept has a definition, it should not need a scope > note (i.e. the two properties should never co-occur). Okay... Just one observation from my point of view: that the example below does not seem to bear out the notion that the two properties should never co-occur. "Includes Russia" does not stand on its own as a definition unless one perhaps assumes that the preferred label speaks for itself, filling in the missing semantics. Taking a less obvious example, "the Sudan" used to refer to a broad region of central Africa -- not just the area (country) called "Sudan" today. In such cases, I should think that a definition plus a scope note could be helpful in sorting out the usage intended. Either way, including an example seems helpful. Tom > > An example of a scope note: > > Concept [ > preferred label: Europe > scope note: includes Russia > ] > > > An example of a definition: > > Concept [ > preferred label: Europe > definition: The sixth-largest continent, extending west from the > Dardanelles, Black Sea, and Ural Mountains. It is technically a vast > peninsula of the Eurasian land mass. > ] > > Does this usage seem reasonable? A better explanation of this in the guide? > > Cheers, > > Al. > -- Dr. Thomas Baker Thomas.Baker@izb.fraunhofer.de Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-160-9664-2129 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft work +49-30-8109-9027 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-144-2352 Personal email: thbaker79@alumni.amherst.edu
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2005 15:08:01 UTC