- From: Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:58:41 -0000
- To: "Bernard Vatant" <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi Bernard, I had thought about something like this, but wasn't sure if it should be done with new vocab in SKOS Core, or with existing vocab from elsewhere. There is the dc:isPartOf / dc:hasPart property pair. There is also the option to declare classes of concepts as OWL restrictions on the skos:inScheme property (as you did in another email) and declare one class to be a subclass of another. Al. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Bernard Vatant > Sent: 24 February 2005 09:43 > To: public-esw-thes@w3.org > Subject: Subdivision of Concept Schemes > > > > > Comes to my mind that current SKOS vocabulary does not > provide any support for asserting > that ConceptScheme A is part of ConceptScheme B. This can be > very useful for large > Thesauri organized in "groups" or "themes" like e.g. GEMET, > which are likely to be > partially reused, or OTOH large concept schemes built from > smaller parts. > > So I would suggest to introduce something like > skos:partOfScheme with domain and range > skos:ConceptScheme > > ************************************************************** > ******************** > > Bernard Vatant > Senior Consultant > Knowledge Engineering > bernard.vatant@mondeca.com > > "Making Sense of Content" : http://www.mondeca.com > "Everything is a Subject" : http://universimmedia.blogspot.com > > ************************************************************** > ******************** > > > --- Alistair Miles Research Associate CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Building R1 Room 1.60 Fermi Avenue Chilton Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QX United Kingdom Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
Received on Friday, 25 February 2005 12:59:13 UTC