- From: Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:18:21 +0100
- To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi all, As Andy explains it below is exactly how these two note properties were intended. So you could say e.g. the function of a skos:changeNote is to record fine-grained information about any change to a concept, and the function of a skos:historyNote is to record instructions for modified usage of a concept after a change has occurred. How does that sound? (Trying to convince myself that there really is a difference in 'function' and not just audience.) I guess the prose in the guide explaining this should be improved? Cheers, Al. > One way to think about historyNote vs. changeNote is that a > history note documents a change to a concept for public > consumption and a change note documents a change to the > thesaurus management system usually for non-public > consumption. > > For example the thesaurus management system may automatically > create change notes when an editor checks in a change to a > concept or group of concepts in the thesaurus. This might > look like: > > <skos:changeNote xml:lang='en'> > Checked in 2005-08-03T13:30:00-04:00 by userX > Check in comment: completed changes to all concepts relating to pears. > </skos:changeNote> > > But the history note might read: > > <skos:historyNote xml:lang='en'> > Pears were previously listed as a narrower term under vegetables > instead of fruits. > </skos:historyNote> > > Wish I could find a really good example in an existing controlled > vocabulary... Not sure if that makes things clearer or more murky. > > > Andy. > >
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2005 11:18:25 UTC