- From: Thomas Baker <thomas.baker@bi.fhg.de>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 20:34:38 +0200
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Ralph Swick (E-mail)" <swick@w3.org>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org, public-esw-thes@w3.org
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:21:20PM +0100, Alistair Miles wrote: > [Abstract] > > This edition of the SKOS Core Vocabulary Specification > [http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core/spec/2005-03-31] s/is > the authoritative/gives a human-readable account of the SKOS > Core Vocabulary at the time of publication. Okay. (Actually, in this case it might very well be the authoritative account, but that is different from saying or implying that in general, Editor's Working Drafts are the authoritative accounts.) > [Introduction] > > This edition of the SKOS Core Vocabulary Specification > [http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core/spec/2005-03-31] s/is > the authoritative/gives a human-readable account of the SKOS > Core Vocabulary at the time of publication. > > N.B. the [@@TODO]s are intended to be replaced with the URLs > of the latest public working draft editions, which we don't > have yet. Fine. > Ralph, what should I cite to point the reader to the difference > between an editor's WD, a public WD, a working group note, > a rec? Should we put a short description in the doc? > > Will leave the rest for another day. Good idea. Tom -- Dr. Thomas Baker Thomas.Baker@izb.fraunhofer.de Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-160-9664-2129 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft work +49-30-8109-9027 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-144-2352 Personal email: thbaker79@alumni.amherst.edu
Received on Friday, 1 April 2005 18:31:01 UTC