- From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:28:51 +0100
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
On 20.10.2004 18:15:47, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: > ... >Should we remove the 'skos:Concept' domain statement for all note >properties, so that they may be used with other things, e.g. RDF properties >and RDFS classes? Haven't thought about the other ones (broader, narrower, etc), but if broadening their domain/range doesn't raise any problems with the skos semantics, I can see a lot of utility in mixing "hard" owl/rdfs relations with "softer" skos relations and using the result as an integrated model. Imagine the nice search apps, that could then tell us "sorry, I couldn't find any [images] from [semantic web conferences], but would you perhaps be interested in [videos] from [rdf workshops]?" ...the reasoner developers will surely hate you.. ;) benjamin -- Benjamin Nowack Kruppstr. 100 45145 Essen, Germany http://www.appmosphere.com/ > >N.B. skos:prefLabel and skos:altLabel have no domain statement for exactly >this reason. > >Al. > >--- >Alistair Miles >Research Associate >CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory >Building R1 Room 1.60 >Fermi Avenue >Chilton >Didcot >Oxfordshire OX11 0QX >United Kingdom >Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk >Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 > > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2004 18:29:03 UTC