RE: search labels

Hi,

I'm fine with 'hiddenLabel' for this. 

However there is another issue to contend with: what should
'skos:hiddenLabel' be a sub-property of?

I originally thought to do:

[property hierarchy]
rdfs:label
	skos:prefLabel
	skos:altLabel
	skos:hiddenLabel

... with the implicit assumption that terms given by skos:prefLabel and
skos:altLabel (or any sub-property thereof) are for display, while those
given by skos:hiddenLabel (or any sub-property thereof) are not.

However, Leonard suggested below that we make 'skos:hiddenLabel' a sub-prop
of 'skos:altLabel' ... which would be at odds with the assumption above.

Al.

---
Alistair Miles
Research Associate
CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Building R1 Room 1.60
Fermi Avenue
Chilton
Didcot
Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
United Kingdom
Email:        a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440



> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Leonard Will
> Sent: 18 October 2004 13:02
> To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
> Subject: Re: search labels
> 
> 
> 
> In message <41738B3B.9030904@gnowsis.com> on Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Leo 
> Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com> wrote
> >
> >ok,
> >so what property name would you suggest?
> >
> >skos:searchLabel ?
> 
> Of the suggestions so far I'd prefer something like hiddenLabel or 
> noDisplayLabel, as these make it clear that we are talking about a 
> sub-class of altLabel (i.e. non-preferred term) that is not normally 
> shown in displays of the thesaurus.
> 
> searchLabel is not appropriate because as has been pointed 
> out all types 
> of label may be used for searching.
> 
> Leonard
> -- 
> Willpower Information       (Partners: Dr Leonard D Will, 
> Sheena E Will)
> Information Management Consultants              Tel: +44 
> (0)20 8372 0092
> 27 Calshot Way, Enfield, Middlesex EN2 7BQ, UK. Fax: +44 
> (0)870 051 7276
> L.Will@Willpowerinfo.co.uk               
> Sheena.Will@Willpowerinfo.co.uk
> ---------------- <URL:http://www.willpowerinfo.co.uk/> 
> -----------------
>

Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 14:10:52 UTC