RE: search labels

Hi Ron, all,
 
I agree, 'searchLabel' isn't perfect ... in fact the other possible name I
had in mind for this property was 'hiddenLabel' :)  Can't think of anything
more elegant at this time.
 
Al.
 

--- 
Alistair Miles 
Research Associate 
CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 
Building R1 Room 1.60 
Fermi Avenue 
Chilton 
Didcot 
Oxfordshire OX11 0QX 
United Kingdom 
Email:        a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk 
Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Ron Davies
Sent: 15 October 2004 09:58
To: Miles, AJ (Alistair) ; 'public-esw-thes@w3.org'
Subject: Re: search labels


Al, 

These can indeed be very useful, for grammatical variations that not handled
in other ways, as well as for misspellings. The name of the property might
be a bit confusing however, as of course other kinds of labels are also used
in searching. As you say, the key defining factor is that these alternative
labels would not be displayed under normal circumstances. So perhaps call it
noDisplayLabel or hiddenLabel (or something more elegant along those lines)?

Ron
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Davies
Information and documentation systems consultant
Av. Baden-Powell 1  Bte 2, 1200 Brussels, Belgium       
Email:  ron@rondavies.be
Tel:    +32 (0)2 770 33 51
GSM:    +32 (0)484 502 393

At 18:16 14/10/2004, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote:



This is just a thought, but what about a property called e.g. 'searchLabel'
that allows you to add labels to a concept to aid user search, where you
*don't* want those labels to appear among the meaning-defining set of labels
for that concept.  This could be used e.g. for common mis-spellings of
another label.

???

Al.   

---
Alistair Miles
Research Associate
CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Building R1 Room 1.60
Fermi Avenue
Chilton
Didcot
Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
United Kingdom
Email:        a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440


                                                

Received on Friday, 15 October 2004 15:48:36 UTC