- From: Houghton,Andrew <houghtoa@oclc.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 14:13:24 -0400
- To: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
> From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) [mailto:A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk] > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 1:59 PM > Subject: RE: Arrays in SKOS: proposal > > Hi Andy, > > We are using RDF Collections here - the skos:members property > should be used exactly as in the #students property in the > example at [1]. > > So a SKOS e.g. in RDF/XML ... > > <skos:Concept rdf:about="URI_X"> > <skos:prefLabel>Aircraft</skos:prefLabel> > <skos:array> > <skos:Array> > <rdfs:label>Aircraft by form</rdfs:label> > <skos:members rdf:parseType="Collection"> > <skos:Concept rdf:about="URI_A"/> > <skos:Concept rdf:about="URI_B"/> > <skos:Concept rdf:about="URI_C"/> > </skos:members> > </skos:Array> > </skos:array> > <skos:narrower rdf:resource="URI_A"/> > <skos:narrower rdf:resource="URI_B"/> > <skos:narrower rdf:resource="URI_C"/> > </skos:Concept> Oops, I missed the collection at skos:members, so skos:ordered goes under skos:members? If that's the case it seems to go against the grain of how the basic RDF rdf:Alt and rdf:Seq work. For example the collection semantics determine how they the element is interpreted. So to extend the rdf:Alt and rdf:Seq analogy, I would expect to see skos:membersUnordered and skos:membersOrdered. BTW, I think those rdf:about under skos:members should be rdf:resource. Andy. Andrew Houghton, OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. http://www.oclc.org/about/ http://www.oclc.org/research/staff/houghton.htm
Received on Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:15:02 UTC