- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:27:57 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hmm. So essentailly we expect to be able to change any definition of any part of SKOS? I am not sure that this is a good idea - and in particular I suspect that Concept is actually stable, and probably the {broad,narrow}er* properties... what do you think? Cheers Chaals On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: > >Following on from the proposal [1] to use the term status schema for >managing the SKOS-Core vocab ... > >I propose the following initial term status values for the terms currently >in the SKOS-Core vocab [2]: > >-- CLASSES -- > >ConceptScheme testing >Concept testing >TopConcept unstable > >--PROPERTIES -- [etc] > >Al. > >[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2004Jul/0013.html >[2] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core.rdf
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 01:27:57 UTC