- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:27:57 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hmm. So essentailly we expect to be able to change any definition of any part
of SKOS? I am not sure that this is a good idea - and in particular I suspect
that Concept is actually stable, and probably the {broad,narrow}er*
properties...
what do you think?
Cheers
Chaals
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote:
>
>Following on from the proposal [1] to use the term status schema for
>managing the SKOS-Core vocab ...
>
>I propose the following initial term status values for the terms currently
>in the SKOS-Core vocab [2]:
>
>-- CLASSES --
>
>ConceptScheme testing
>Concept testing
>TopConcept unstable
>
>--PROPERTIES --
[etc]
>
>Al.
>
>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2004Jul/0013.html
>[2] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core.rdf
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 01:27:57 UTC