- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:04:02 -0000
- To: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
I've added this issue to the discussion on the RDF Thesaurus wiki page <http://esw.w3.org/topic/RdfThesaurus> Here is a summary:- Issue 3 - How to label concepts? In a thesaurus, every concept has one preferred term (label) and 0 or more alternative terms. The obvious way to model this in RDF is to have one property for linking a resource to a preferred label (I'll call this soks:prefLabel for now) and one property for linking a resource to any alternative labels (I'll call this soks:altLabel for now). This raises two design questions:- Question 1: domain restriction? - Do we (a) restrict the domain of these properties to soks:Concept or do we (b) allow them to be used with any resource? Question 2: resources or literals? - Do we (a) restrict the range of these properties to rdfs:Literal, or do we (b) restrict the range to some type of resource? We may be able to re-use and/or extend existing properties, e.g. rdfs:label, but what we choose to re-use depends on the resolution of these questions, so I'm saving a discussion of that for later. The choice of solution to question 2 has important implications for multilingual data and labelling ... ... more at <http://esw.w3.org/topic/RdfThesaurus> CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Building R1 Room 1.60 Fermi Avenue Chilton Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QX United Kingdom Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk Telephone: +44 (0)1235 445440
Received on Friday, 31 October 2003 12:04:08 UTC