- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:17:29 -0000
- To: 'Dan Brickley' <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Cayzer, Steve'" <Steve.Cayzer@hp.com>, "'NJ Rogers, Learning and Research Technology'" <Nikki.Rogers@bristol.ac.uk>, Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
> Backing up a bit, is there a lot of value in having a cardinality > constraint on soks:descriptor? > > <soks:Concept> > <soks:descriptor xml:lang="en">Bangers and mash > (cuisine)</soks:descriptor> > <soks:descriptor xml:lang="fr">Saucisson et pomme de terre > Anglais</soks:descriptor> > </soks:Concept> > > ...looks good to me. Is it significantly more annoying for > some classes > of user, implementation etc? > > Dan It just means we have to write some guidelines for usage and hope people stick to them. We can't use something like OWL to formally express the constraint. Personally, I'm fine with this approach. It's simple and pragmatic. Anyone think this could be a problem? Al.
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 07:19:14 UTC