Re: New SKOS-Mapping without rdf:li

Hi,

Looks fine to me at first glance.

A very minor improvement would be to change the name soks-map:member to 
better reflect that its value is a list of members e.g. socks-map:memberList.

Cheers,
Dave

Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote:

> What do you think of this sort of thing ....
> 
> <soks:Concept rdf:about="#A">
> 	<soks-map:exactMatch>
> 		<soks-map:AND>
> 			<soks-map:member parseType="collection">
> 				<soks:Concept rdf:about="#B"/>
> 				<soks:Concept rdf:about="#C"/>
> 				<soks-map:NOT>
> 					<soks-map:member>
> 						<soks:Concept
> rdf:about="#D"/>
> 					</soks-map:member>
> 				</soks-map:NOT>
> 			</soks-map:member>
> 		</soks-map:AND>
> 	</soks-map:exactMatch>
> </soks:Concept>
> 
> <soks:Concept rdf:about="#A">
> 	<soks-map:broadMatch>
> 		<soks-map:OR>
> 			<soks-map:member parseType="collection">
> 				<soks:Concept rdf:about="#B"/>
> 				<soks:Concept rdf:about="#C"/>
> 			</soks-map:member>
> 		</soks-map:OR>
> 	</soks-map:broadMatch>
> </soks:Concept>
> 
> ??
> 
> Al.
> 
> CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
> Building R1 Room 1.60
> Fermi Avenue
> Chilton
> Didcot
> Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
> United Kingdom
> 
> Email:        a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
> Telephone: +44 (0)1235 445440
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 4 December 2003 11:04:25 UTC