- From: James Briano <jamesbriano@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 18:34:44 -0800
- To: vincent.wartelle@isicrunch.com
- Cc: Luc AUDRAIN <luc.audrain@editnatax.info>, Marianne Gulstad Pedersen <mgp@publizon.dk>, "David H. Rothman" <davidrothman@pobox.com>, Editing by David <david@editingbydavid.com>, Eric Frick <efrick@destinlearning.com>, "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@fromoldbooks.org>, W3C EPUB3 Community Group <public-epub3@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKFUdag1+MLVKJkTrjTPNOzhN=qwKxaTwOcL4f1ydpvutsrGrg@mail.gmail.com>
The logo that most often appears in searches contributes to the confusion: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Epub_logo_color.svg I think EPub makes sense (Electronic Publication).... along the lines of REx (Range Extender). However, EPUB is the definitive format. On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 1:13 AM <vincent.wartelle@isicrunch.com> wrote: > So do I, “EPUB” is my way to write it. > > > > Vincent Wartelle > > M : +33 6 70 07 75 49 T : +33 1 69 29 89 03 > > *ISI* > 1 avenue de l'Atlantique – Bâtiment Mac Kinley > 91940 LES ULIS – France > > www.isicrunch.com > LinkedIn: https://fr.linkedin.com/in/vincentwartelle > > > > *From:* Luc AUDRAIN <luc.audrain@editnatax.info> > *Sent:* lundi 2 novembre 2020 09:39 > *To:* Marianne Gulstad Pedersen <mgp@publizon.dk> > *Cc:* David H. Rothman <davidrothman@pobox.com>; Editing by David < > david@editingbydavid.com>; Eric Frick <efrick@destinlearning.com>; Liam > R. E. Quin <liam@fromoldbooks.org>; public-epub3@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: The correct formatting style of the word 'epub' > > > > I also support EPUB as the format name. > > Standard documents even in ISO work write « EPUB ». > > > > Luc > > > > Le 2 nov. 2020 à 09:20, Marianne Gulstad Pedersen <mgp@publizon.dk> a > écrit : > > > > > > No. Those who ‘invented’ the format gets to name it, and they decided on: > > EPUB > > (filename.epub) > > > > All specifications use the Word “EPUB”. > > Therefore, I always write it that way. > > > > man. 2. nov. 2020 kl. 09.08 skrev David H. Rothman <davidrothman@pobox.com > >: > > Yes, some very smart techies officially settled on EPUB years ago as the > official usage. But in the TeleRead blog, I’ve personally continued to > stick to ePub. ALL CAPS looks UGLY. It SHOUTS. > > > > If we boosters want to please consumers, as well as the English majors who > run so much of the publishing industry, then let’s consider ePub at least > as an officially permitted option. > > > > Both Publishers Weekly and The New York Times have often used ePub. In > both cases, it might even be the most common way. > > > > Let’s care about popular usage and expanding name recognition so we’re > more competitive against Kindle formats in the U.S. and other places where > they dominate. > > > > The market just might be telling us something. > > > > David > > > > David H. Rothman > > Editor-Publisher-Founder, TeleRead.org > > (An early popularizer of the ePub format) > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 5:12 PM Liam R. E. Quin <liam@fromoldbooks.org> > wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-11-01 at 13:33 -0500, Editing by David wrote: > > > > So, what is the official way this term is supposed to be written? > > Especially in a more technical book. > > epUB, and it's pronounced ep-yoo-bee.:) > > Seriously, i'd probably set it as EPUB in small caps in a publication. > > > Liam > > > > -- > Liam Quin, https://www.delightfulcomputing.com/ > Available for XML/Document/Information Architecture/XSLT/ > XSL/XQuery/Web/Text Processing/A11Y training, work & consulting. > Barefoot Web-slave, antique illustrations: http://www.fromoldbooks.org > > -- > > Mange hilsner > > Marianne Gulstad > > EPUB QA & Grafisk Design > > > > Publizon A/S > > Frederiksgade 74E > > DK-8000 Aarhus > > Mob: (+45) 60 37 38 25 > > >
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: image003.jpg
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2020 02:35:11 UTC