W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-epub3@w3.org > September 2018

RE: Call for Consensus: Publishing EPUB 3.2 as a Final Community Group Report

From: Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 08:43:01 -0300
To: "'Dave Cramer'" <dauwhe@gmail.com>, "'W3C EPUB3 Community Group'" <public-epub3@w3.org>
Message-ID: <007001d45720$6a024290$3e06c7b0$@gmail.com>
My only complaint, if you want to call it that, is that "final community group report" sounds so... unauthoritative. The charter mentioned that IDPF designations would continue to be used for the published documents (Recommended Specification instead of W3C Recommendation, for example). Does the publishing group have special dispensation to continue using those for EPUB 3 releases? Is it still possible that the final versions will use those designations?

If not, still a +1.

Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com> 
Sent: September 27, 2018 14:30
To: W3C EPUB3 Community Group <public-epub3@w3.org>
Subject: Call for Consensus: Publishing EPUB 3.2 as a Final Community Group Report

Hi Everyone,

During our call today, the CG decided to recommend publishing EPUB 3.2 as a final community group report.

This is a 72-hour-ish call for consensus: If you support the final publication of EPUB 3.2, please respond affirmatively to this email in the next 72 hours. A "+1" will suffice if you don't feel wordy. Please reply even if you were on the call today.

If you are opposed to the final publication, please let us know, and preferably with much more than a "-1".

Please respond by Midnight UTC on Monday, October 1, which is

5:00PM PDT Monday (San Francisco)
8:00PM EDT Monday (New York)
2:00AM CEST Tuesday (Paris)
1:00AM BST Tuesday (London)
8:00AM JST Tuesday (Tokyo)
4:30AM IST Tuesday  (Chennai)

Thanks!

Dave Cramer
co-chair
Received on Friday, 28 September 2018 11:43:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:44:31 UTC