W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-epub3@w3.org > September 2018

Re: EPUB 3.2 Editorial Assignments

From: John B. Costa <jbcosta@repubit.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 12:26:21 -0400
To: Rachel Comerford <rachel.comerford@macmillan.com>
CC: W3C EPUB 3 Community Group <public-epub3@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D7B6CBD4.109FE4%jbcosta@repubit.com>
Rachel:  3.2 CHANGES Review

6.0 ­ 6.9 Reviewed,  Links checked,  no errors or typos.
I submitted one recommendation to GitHub for 6.5
<https://w3c.github.io/publ-epub-revision/epub32/spec/epub-changes.html#stru
ctural-semantics>     It looks like it was just insertedŠ. Thanks.

Let me know if there is anything else I can assist with.


John B. Costa  CEO - RePubIT, LLC | Chair: IEEE ADB Committee
Sanford FL 32771 USA   +1 321 262-3626
jbcosta@repubit.com  |  www.linkedin.com/in/johnbcosta1
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/johnbcosta1>

Natural Talents Applied Well


From:  Rachel Comerford <rachel.comerford@macmillan.com>
Date:  Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 5:10 PM
To:  John Costa <jbcosta@repubit.com>
Cc:  W3C EPUB 3 Community Group <public-epub3@w3.org>
Subject:  Re: EPUB 3.2 Editorial Assignments

Thanks John!

Rachel Comerford | Senior Director of Content Standards and Accessibility |
T 212.576.9433 

Macmillan Learning

On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:31 PM, John B. Costa <jbcosta@repubit.com> wrote:
> Rachel:
> 
> EPUB3.2 Changes Tab:
> * 5.0-5.3 look good.  No typošs, grammatical, or language issues.  Links all
> resolve to the correct docs or location within 3.2.
> * I am working on 6.0-6.9 this evening.  Should be finished by tomorrow
> morning EDT.  
> 
> John B. Costa  CEO - RePubIT, LLC | Chair: IEEE ADB Committee
> Sanford FL 32771 USA   +1 321 262-3626
> jbcosta@repubit.com  |  www.linkedin.com/in/johnbcosta1
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/johnbcosta1>
> 
> Natural Talents Applied Well
> 
> 
> From:  Rachel Comerford <rachel.comerford@macmillan.com>
> Date:  Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 12:51 PM
> To:  W3C EPUB 3 Community Group <public-epub3@w3.org>
> Subject:  EPUB 3.2 Editorial Assignments
> Resent-From:  <public-epub3@w3.org>
> Resent-Date:  Thu, 26 Jul 2018 16:52:26 +0000
> 
> In order to increase the likelihood that our specs have received sufficient
> review, we are reviving an editorial review practice initiated with 3.1. In
> this google spreadsheet
> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TDcBudM9UTm41PxFAX3UqGlvcqNertJpdYNZ0
> WWq758/edit#gid=483122108>  is a list of assignees and the sections we would
> like them to review. We have to keep the sections reasonable. Please review
> your section by end of day September 7th. If you are unable to review your
> section, please notify me immediately so I can reassign your sections.
> 
> 
> To perform your review, please read the listed sections carefully, looking for
> any issues, such as clarity in language and consistency. You do not have to be
> a subject matter expert in the area that you are reviewing. If you find any
> problems, please report them using github, or use the mailing list if that
> would be more appropriate. Once you have completed your review, whether you
> have found errors or not, please email me directly so I can note the section
> has been covered. When reviewing a section, you may stop when a new section
> not on your list starts.
> 
> Here again is a link to the assignments. I will also be emailing participants
> separately to notify them of assignments:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TDcBudM9UTm41PxFAX3UqGlvcqNertJpdYNZ0W
> Wq758/edit#gid=483122108
> 
> If you do not have an assignment and would like to contribute, please let me
> know!!
> Rachel and Dave
> 
> Rachel Comerford | Senior Director of Content Standards and Accessibility | T
> 212.576.9433 
> 
> Macmillan Learning
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2018 16:26:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:44:30 UTC