EPUB 3.2 Editorial Assignments

In order to increase the likelihood that our specs have received sufficient
review, we are reviving an editorial review practice initiated with 3.1. In
this google spreadsheet
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TDcBudM9UTm41PxFAX3UqGlvcqNertJpdYNZ0WWq758/edit#gid=483122108>
is a list of assignees and the sections we would like them to review. We
have to keep the sections reasonable. Please review your section by end of
day September 7th. If you are unable to review your section, please notify
me immediately so I can reassign your sections.


To perform your review, please read the listed sections carefully, looking
for any issues, such as clarity in language and consistency. You do not
have to be a subject matter expert in the area that you are reviewing. If
you find any problems, please report them using github, or use the mailing
list if that would be more appropriate. Once you have completed your
review, whether you have found errors or not, please email me directly so I
can note the section has been covered. When reviewing a section, you may
stop when a new section not on your list starts.

Here again is a link to the assignments. I will also be emailing
participants separately to notify them of assignments:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TDcBudM9UTm41PxFAX3UqGlvcqNertJpdYNZ0WWq758/edit#gid=483122108

If you do not have an assignment and would like to contribute, please let
me know!!
Rachel and Dave

Rachel Comerford | Senior Director of Content Standards and Accessibility |
T 212.576.9433

*Macmillan Learning*