W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-epub3@w3.org > June 2017

Re: [epubcheck] Test file directory structure proposal

From: Brady Duga <duga@google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 07:14:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH_p_eW2yfzUM-LVpZ=h2_chWvsdf9aCiB0aTEceG9OjV8Jwjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
Cc: "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>, public-epub3@w3.org
+1 for unzipped. We would also lose reasonable history, unless github does
some magic.

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'll offer an opinion: unzipped except for tests of zipping. Other than
> being easier to work with unzipped files, when anyone commits changes you
> don't have to rely on their commit log but can inspect the changed files.
> Github doesn't show changes to individual files within a zip container, or
> not last I looked.
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> *From:* Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken [mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com]
> *Sent:* June 20, 2017 9:44 AM
> *To:* Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>
> *Cc:* public-epub3@w3.org
> *Subject:* RE: [epubcheck] Test file directory structure proposal
>
>
>
> Thanks, Garth
>
>
>
> That’s what I get for writing this stuff at the end of my day. I am
> surprised that no one has an opinion on zipped/unzipped. It’s a hot topic.
>
>
>
> The divvying is for the people on the epubcheck TF who said they were up
> for it.  Romain or Tobias were planning to write step-by-step instructions.
> I don’t want to break anything though. I hope to corner Romain when he see
> him later this week to make sure that we do this in a way that works.
>
>
>
> The actual reorg is a real project. I am hoping that someone volunteers. I
> have a few people in mind if no one steps up.
>
>
>
> Tzviya
>
>
>
> *Tzviya Siegman*
>
> Information Standards Lead
>
> Wiley
>
> 201-748-6884 <(201)%20748-6884>
>
> tsiegman@wiley.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Garth Conboy [mailto:garth@google.com <garth@google.com>]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 20, 2017 9:19 AM
> *To:* Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com>
> *Cc:* public-epub3@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: [epubcheck] Test file directory structure proposal
>
>
>
> Morning Tzviya,
>
>
>
> I think there likely wants to be some discussion on the point of
> disagreement in the document between Brady and I, regarding the canonical
> storage format for test EPUB files -- zipped ".epub"s (based on Dave's
> file) or exploded directories (based on unzipping Dave's file).  Either
> will fit in the proposed structure, and there are some plusses and minuses
> to each -- those actually working with current test should likely chime in.
>
>
>
> I'm not sure any egalitarian "divvying" will work in practice -- those
> that do the work must be comfortable with pulling the source and
> running/checking the tests -- and some light coding.  This reorganization
> is a real project.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>    Garth
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <
> tsiegman@wiley.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Garth and Brady. We are ahead of schedule!
>
>
>
> I see no comments on this. Do we all agree with this organizational
> structure for the repo?
>
>
>
> Everyone did their homework very quickly. We now have a proposed naming
> convention for files [1], a minimal file [2]. Please take some time to
> review these proposals and offer your feedback by the end of the month, as
> we agreed.
>
>
>
> I will divvy up the files for clean up according to these rules next week.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Tzviya
>
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/IDPF/epubcheck/wiki/TestSuiteCleanup#define-a-
> naming-convention
>
> [2] https://github.com/IDPF/epubcheck/tree/master/src/
> test/resources/minimal-epub
>
>
>
> *Tzviya Siegman*
>
> Information Standards Lead
>
> Wiley
>
> 201-748-6884 <(201)%20748-6884>
>
> tsiegman@wiley.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Garth Conboy [mailto:garth@google.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:55 PM
> *To:* public-epub3@w3.org
> *Subject:* [epubcheck] Test file directory structure proposal
>
>
>
> Hello epubchckers,
>
>
>
> I've put together a proposal for this action item with Brady's blessing
> (and one noted area of disagreement).
>
>
>
> The document can be found here
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7-aSgdA-6dd-5zOTOqwAJGlh2Aa4hYFX1TcCdDesYo/edit#heading=h.ymvhjyrr5mdi>
> .
>
>
>
> Everybody with the link has comment access, and if specific folks would
> like to edit, just let me know.
>
>
>
> Of course, conversation can happen on this thread too.
>
>
>
> Have a good weekend (which I'm starting early just about now).
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>    Garth
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 20 June 2017 14:15:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:44:26 UTC