Re: EOCred: recognition of credential

I agree.  I didn't understand the argument about it blocking future use
because in the way it was being defined obligations and verifications were
two separate "things".

Alexander Jackl
CEO & President, Bardic Systems, Inc.
alex@bardicsystems.com
M: 508.395.2836
O: 401.384.0566
F: 617.812.6020
http://bardicsystems.com

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk> wrote:

> Thank you Nate. I understand your reluctance to accept unverified
> statements of recognition for your use cases and appreciate your agreement
> not to block their use for other cases (where I think verification can be
> by other means).
>
> I don't think here is the right place to go into details of how our
> proposal would work with any future development of verifiable endorsements,
> but I think there are a couple of options: either using a pattern similar
> to that shown <http://blog.schema.org/2014/06/introducing-role.html> by
> Role <http://schema.org/Role> where an intermediate schema.org type can
> provide additional information about a relationship (the AlignmentObject
> does something like this too), or by creating new verifiedRecognition
> property. I am confident therefore that having recognizedBy as a property
> won't prejudice any future efforts to verify such a claim.
>
> Regards, Phil.
>
> On 22/05/18 15:49, Nate Otto wrote:
>
> For me, the verifiable endorsements are the only type of recognition that
> I would trust. I won't block the inclusion of recognizedBy, but structuring
> the relationship as RecognizedEntity.recognizedBy -> RecognizingEntity
> doesn't allow for the relationship to flow through a specific verifiable
> record describing that recognition. I think the
> RecognizedEntity.endorsements -> Endorsement -> Endorsement.issuer ->
> RecognizingEntity allows us to describe the scope or purpose the credential
> or other entity is recognized for.
>
> Nate Otto
> Director, Open Badges, Concentric Sky
> concentricsky.com
> he/him/his
>
>
> --
>
> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil
> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning;
> information systems for education.
> CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for
> innovation in education technology.
>
> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company,
> number SC569282.
> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in
> England number OC399090
>