Re: Inherited from CreativeWork was Re: EOCred: Important: progress and the beginning of the end

Sounds good, Phil.

Thanks,
Bob

> On Jun 14, 2018, at 10:57 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/06/18 13:37, Bob Dolan wrote:
>> I agree that Issue 1 probably requires some further conversation. At the very least, there should be a statement that we’ve proceeded with the assumption that EducationalOccupationalCredential should indeed a subtype of CreativeWork, as well as a summarization of what it would take if it were instead a subtype of Intangible.
>> 
> Thanks Bob, I have looked through the summary for each use case we have addressed. As far as I can make out the only properties inherited from CreativeWork that are required to meet explicit use cases are offers and inLanguage. 
> 
> Other properties that may be useful include award, contributor, copyrightHolder, creator, comments, educationalAlignment, expires, keywords, review (and possibly others).
> 
> I have added a note to this effect on the wiki <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Issues_arising_from_proposals#Issues_arising_from_proposals_to_address_use_cases> [1].
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
> 1. https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Issues_arising_from_proposals#Issues_arising_from_proposals_to_address_use_cases <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Issues_arising_from_proposals#Issues_arising_from_proposals_to_address_use_cases>
> 
>> Bob
>> 
>>> On Jun 4, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk <mailto:phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello all. A reminder about the request for thoughts and comments below. Just reply to this message if you have anything to say.
>>> 
>>> I understand if you're thinking 'oh no not more EOCred'. We've done a lot of work, you're allowed a certain amount of fatigue. That in itself is enough to congratulate ourselves on what we have done well, identify the bits that we have reservations about, send the good bits to schema.org <http://schema.org/> for consideration, and move on.
>>> best regards, Phil
>>> 
>>> On 23/05/18 11:07, Phil Barker wrote:
>>>> Hello all, 
>>>> If you have been waiting for a chance to engage with the general work of this group rather than the nitty gritty of individual use cases and property definitions, this would be a good time to do so.
>>>> 
>>>> You may have seen that I posted a summary of our progress <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/2018/05/23/progress-so-far-and-the-beginning-of-the-end/> so far, and pointers to what we need to do to complete the work [1]. The pointers to what we need to to complete the work are also summarized <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Issues_arising_from_proposals> on the wiki [2].
>>>> 
>>>> Actions: (please)
>>>> 1. Check the progress <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/2018/05/23/progress-so-far-and-the-beginning-of-the-end/>, raise any issues you think I may have missed; i.e. let me know if you are not happy about how a use case has been addressed.
>>>> 
>>>> 2. Check the issues <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Issues_arising_from_proposals>. I propose that all the use cases that remain unaddressed be deferred for future contributions to schema.org <http://schema.org/>; I also propose that issues 2 - 6 be similarly deferred. Issue 1 probably requires some further conversation.
>>>> 
>>>> Let me know if anything needs clarifying. I know it is a fairly long summary, but still I didn't go into much detail by way of explanations.
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards, Phil.
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/2018/05/23/progress-so-far-and-the-beginning-of-the-end/ <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/2018/05/23/progress-so-far-and-the-beginning-of-the-end/>
>>>> [2] https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Issues_arising_from_proposals <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Issues_arising_from_proposals>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>
>>>> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk/>: technology to enhance learning; information systems for education.
>>>> CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk/>: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education technology.
>>>> 
>>>> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, number SC569282.
>>>> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in England number OC399090
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>
>>> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk/>: technology to enhance learning; information systems for education.
>>> CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk/>: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education technology.
>>> 
>>> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, number SC569282.
>>> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in England number OC399090
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>
> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk/>: technology to enhance learning; information systems for education.
> CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk/>: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education technology.
> 
> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, number SC569282.
> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in England number OC399090
>