- From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:35:15 +0000
- To: public-eocred-schema@w3.org
- Message-ID: <1b424b86-0347-1862-0e9e-8049b2fbf9eb@pjjk.co.uk>
On 29/01/18 15:20, Richard Wallis wrote: > On 29 January 2018 at 15:02, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk > <mailto:phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>> wrote: > > If you want the cost to include the learning opportunity then I > think we will need a new property along the lines of "typical > aggregated cost". > > > I think this would not be an advisable route to take. > > The costs of such learning opportunities should be defined in an > /Offer/ by the provider of that opportunity, possibly linked to the > EOC via Offer->addOn. > > As to a “typical aggregated cost” - who would do the aggregating and > calculation of what is typical? - a minefield for confusion and out of > date data. Fair point. P. -- Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; information systems for education. CETIS LLP: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education technology. PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, number SC569282. CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in England number OC399090
Received on Monday, 29 January 2018 15:35:41 UTC