[EOWG] Responses to Questionnaire Accessibility Course List Eagle Review

Dear Andrew,

We would first like to thank you for taking the time to contribute to improving this resource.

We have received valuable feedback and some of the suggestions have already been incorporated into the tool, others have been added to our to-do list for the next development stages, and others may need further discussion.

The updated version is currently available at: https://614c42623e94470008d04ab1--wai-list-of-courses.netlify.app/list-of-courses/

A brief summary of all the updates made is available at:
https://github.com/leticiaseixas/wai-list-of-courses/blob/914a8c32080caa4175f874ec5df8ded53f867132/README.md


Following is the list of the answers you have provided in the Eagle Review Survey with our comments for each one of them. Let us know if you have any further considerations or additional clarifications on any topic are needed.


  *   Attributes for describing offers


     *   I'm not sure of the relevance of 'Country' - that fact that it was published in the USA or UK for example adds little if any information


We believe this attribute is important for face-to-face offers, but also for offers, for instance, addressing laws and policies that are closely related to a given country.



  *   Filter categories


     *   The filter category of 'Offer type' might need a glossary


We have reviewed this category, as well as the degree of certification category. Current attributes for defining an offer are: Graduate program, Undergraduate program, Training program, Professional certification, and Other. According to the feedback received about these changes, we will further discuss in future surveys which items can benefit from an associated info button with a sort of glossary.


     *   Would there be a need for 'Sample for free' under the 'Cost' category?


We have reviewed this category, renaming “Free for limited time” to “Free for limited content or duration”.


     *   Should their be a 'Language' category to filter by?


We have included a “Language” filter. We propose this filter including only the languages available in current offers in order to minimize the number of options.


  *   Landing page


     *   Definitely think there should be 'another page with overview information about this resource should be the landing page'. Submit a new course could be on both pages IMHO


Considering the feedback received, we believe that some of the items were not clear enough. The changes we have made aimed to make this information more intuitive so that we don't need a page with additional instructions. As previously mentioned, we will further discuss which specific items can benefit from additional information.



Thank you for your time and we look forward to hearing your comments.

Best,
Letícia

---
Letícia Seixas Pereira
LASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa