Re: [wbs] response to 'Curricula -- Designer Modules Starfish Review'

Hello Shadi,

All guidelines dealing with Plain Language and Easy to Read recommend the use of "sans-serif typefaces" versus "serif typefaces" to support readability and legibility.

  *   https://www.plainlanguage.gov/guidelines/design/
  *   https://inclusionireland.ie/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/european-easy-read-standards.pdf

Best,

Estel·la Oncins Noguer
Post Doctoral Research Fellow TransMedia Catalonia
Edifici MRA 126  - Campus UAB
08193 Bellaterra
Barcelona
T. +34 610 655 149

orcid.org/0000-0002-0291-3036<https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0291-3036><https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0291-3036>
http://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/transmedia<http://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/transmedia/>
<http://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/transmedia/>
<http://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/transmedia/>

<http://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/transmedia/><http://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/transmedia/>

________________________________
De: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Enviat el: dijous, 22 de juliol de 2021 12:48
Per a: Estel·la Oncins Noguer <Estella.Oncins@uab.cat>; dmontalvo@w3.org <dmontalvo@w3.org>
A/c: public-eo-archive@w3.org <public-eo-archive@w3.org>
Tema: Re: [wbs] response to 'Curricula -- Designer Modules Starfish Review'

Hi Estel·la,

On 13/07/2021 17:33, Estella Oncins via WBS Mailer wrote:
> I would maybe add specific mention to the recommendation of using
> "sans-serif typefaces" to support readability and include also the term
> "legibility".
> Readability (text readability) and legibility (ease of letter recognition).
>
> All mentions to font size should also include mention to "sans-serif
> typefaces"

Which recommendation are you referring to in this context? I think there
is no consensus decision from AGWG on font face, just that the users are
able to adjust these to their own needs and preferences.

Best,
   Shadi

--
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

Received on Friday, 23 July 2021 05:50:13 UTC