- From: Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:26:15 -0500
- To: "Bakken, Brent" <brent.bakken@pearson.com>, Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@paciellogroup.com>, "Rochford, John" <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>
- Cc: EO Archive <public-eo-archive@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA++nJxqsPPR6Bm0=n=7sN6rD7f=Nhx8oSzca6J3XKJgEcjLO=w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Brent, Thank you for this clear outline of expectations. I was speaking with John Rochford earlier his week and he let me know that he and Jeanne Spellman are rewriting the new Understand docs in plain language. It makes sense for me for all of us to get in sync so we do not duplicate effort. Jeanne and John for your information, Norah Sinclair (copied here) is leading a small group from EO to review and recommend edits to the Understanding docs. They are working through GitHub and we would be happy for you to join the next group call (see schedule below.) Cheers all, Sharron On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Bakken, Brent <brent.bakken@pearson.com> wrote: > Hello Review Team, > > I know that many of you saw this in the email I sent out yesterday, but I > just wanted to resend to this small group again today just to be sure > everyone understands the timelines and task for this upcoming week. (And > thank you to those of you who have already started!!!) > > I have added some *review deadlines to the first two understanding > documents* that Norah has assigned us to review. I would like these two > reviews complete by end of day Friday, 20 July. Please set aside time this > weekend or next week to thoroughly review the two following documents and > provide feedback using the two GitHub issues that Norah has already > created. > > *Two Notes on reviewing:* > > 1. Once you read through the current understanding document, you may > want to review the GitHub issue *before* you start adding more to the > thread in case others have already raised your edit issue. That way you can > support their comment, or add to the recommended edit. > 2. If you don't like the way something is worded in the understanding > document, please indicate so, but also when possible, go the extra mile to > offer a suggested rewording that Norah can work from when making edits. As > a reminder, this is how the review process will work: Overview of > Process <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Understanding_docs#Overview> > [1] > > > *Here is this week's assignment:* > > - Review and comment on 1.4.10 Reflow > <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Understanding_docs#Understanding_1.4.10_Reflow_.28Level_AA.29> [2] > by *Friday, 20 July* (hard deadline) > - Review and comment on 1.4.11 Non-Text Contrast > <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Understanding_docs#Understanding_1.4.11_Non-Text_Contrast_.28Level_AA.29> [3] > by *Friday, 20 July* (hard deadline) > > (If you have extra time, begin reviews of 1.4.12, 1.4.13, and 4.1.3 also > listed in WCAG 2.1 Understanding docs > <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Understanding_docs#Understanding_1.4.12_Text_Spacing_.28Level_AA.29> [4] > - These will have due dates assigned in future weeks.) > > Thank you all for helping to make these understanding documents more > "understandable". :) > > Brent > > [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Understanding_docs#Overview > [2] https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Understanding_docs# > Understanding_1.4.10_Reflow_.28Level_AA.29 > [3] https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Understanding_docs# > Understanding_1.4.11_Non-Text_Contrast_.28Level_AA.29 > [4] https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Understanding_docs# > Understanding_1.4.12_Text_Spacing_.28Level_AA.29 > > > Brent A. Bakken > Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services > Psychometrics & Testing Services > *Pearson* > > 512 202 1087 > brent.bakken@pearson.com > > > > > -- Sharron Rush | Executive Director | Knowbility.org | @knowbility *Equal access to technology for people with disabilities*
Received on Friday, 13 July 2018 15:26:48 UTC