Re: Older Resources pages

[added Norah who I believe was present on the previous call]

Hi Vicki, all,

Please find attached a revised version of the Older People slides, with 
the changes I had described during the call (removed demographics, most 
external links, and descriptions of the WAI-AGE Project).

The idea is to archive the current 2010 version of the slides, then this 
new 2017 version refers to it as background. I think the content that is 
now in the 2017 version is quite stable and valid today.

I hope the HTML attachment is not too clunky and you can all read it. 
The specific question now is: is this approach worthwhile to continue, 
or do people feel we should stop work on these slides.

Best,
   Shadi


On 01/12/2017 14:20, Bakken, Brent wrote:
> Thanks for sending this recap Vicki. Adding public-eo-archive for records.
> 
> *__*
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Victoria Menezes Miller 
> <menezesmiller@gmail.com <mailto:menezesmiller@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Dear Charlotte, Brent, Norah, Robert, Shadi, Andrew, and [Shawn],
> 
>     We shall have a discussion on the Older Resources pages this afternoon.
> 
>     In this respect, some additional minor changes have been done to the
>     following resources, as follows:
> 
>     *Main "overview" page:*
>     https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Web_and_Older_Users#Understanding_Older_Web_Users
>     <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Web_and_Older_Users#Understanding_Older_Web_Users>
> 
>       * I shifted a sentence found after the bulleted list (2nd level
>         heading "Overlapping needs...") back to end of the first
>         paragraph.  The shifted sentence reads  "By applying
>         international guidelines...etc." _Rationale for the shift in
>         position_:  after looking at the page with some "gap" in
>         between, it seemed more logical to place the sentence there.
>       * In the bulleted list where the Literature Review and WAI-AGE is
>         mentioned, I added that WAI-AGE ended on 30 September 2010
>       * Decision for this afternoon:  concerning WAI-AGE.  At the end of
>         the page, there is a paragraph on WAI-AGE 2010.  Should this be
>         removed entirely and a link placed to the WAI-AGE page at the
>         bullet point where the Literature Review is mentioned or do you
>         want to keep the paragraph on WAI-AGE?
>       * Last call for any further changes/suggestions to this resource.
> 
>     *Literature Review page:*
>     https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/New_Overview_page#Introduction
>     <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/New_Overview_page#Introduction>
>     The following minor changes were made:
> 
>       * changes of verb to past tense where applicable as regards WAI-AGE
>       * added that the project WAI-AGE ended on 30 September 2010
>       * Last call for any further changes to this resource
> 
>     *Presentation page:*
>     https://www.w3.org/WAI/presentations/ageing/
>     <https://www.w3.org/WAI/presentations/ageing/>*
>     *
> 
>       * Decision for this afternoon:  Do we keep the presentation page
>         with mention that it will be updated in due course or do we
>         remove it?
> 
>     Wiki page with history of changes on Older Users Resources:
>     https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Older_Users_Resources
>     <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Older_Users_Resources>
> 
>     Looking forward to discussing,
> 
>     Best,
> 
>     Vicki
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)