- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:06:41 +0200
- To: Nic Steenhout <nic@knowbility.org>
- Cc: Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>, Brent Bakken <brent.bakken@pearson.com>, "Keen, Laura" <lkee@loc.gov>, "public-eo-archive@w3.org" <public-eo-archive@w3.org>
Hi Nic, Looking good on a quick skim! In my view, there is room for a little more explanation here and there, especially in the listing of features. I think many people are just not aware how different tools can be -- for example, we do not talk about the educational purpose of some of the tools (such as WAVE or similar). I'm not sure when I can provide specific editorial suggestions, and do not want to hold up your work, so feel free to take this to EOWG. I may provide my input as part of the EOWG review, if you decide to do one. Best, Shadi On 05/10/2017 15:44, Nic Steenhout wrote: > Hello Shadi, > > Please note that I have made further edits as requested by Sharron in > Knowbility's Slack channel. > > I was asked to pass it on to you for review before it goes to full EO > review. > > https://github.com/w3c/wai-selecting-eval-tools/blob/master/index.md > > I added a comment to the commit. > > One thing I note is that in the filters on the Tools page, a rubric is > called "Technology", but the tool features call it "Supported formats". > This is incongruent and should be rectified to pick only one on that page. > And the Features page should reflect that change. > > Thank you > > Nic > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2017 15:06:51 UTC