RE: Updates to Selecting Evaluation Tools

Thanks Brent.


1.       Please report issues in GitHub https://github.com/w3c/wai-selecting-eval-tools/issues

2.       comments by COB Thursday September 21 if possible, if not please let us know.

Thanks for the review.

Laura

From: Bakken, Brent [mailto:brent.bakken@pearson.com]
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 1:13 PM
To: Nic Steenhout; Keen, Laura
Cc: Sharron Rush; Green, James; Shadi Abou-Zahra (shadi@w3.org); Robert Jolly; public-eo-archive@w3.org
Subject: Re: Updates to Selecting Evaluation Tools

Hi Nic and Laura,

Thanks for pulling this review request together. Just a couple of things.


  1.  I am assuming that you would like this small review team to put any feedback, recommendations, or suggested edits into this same GitHub repository as Issues titled appropriately. Please confirm.
  2.  Also, Can you please provide the small review team with a deadline to be sure to have the review completed by (hope that mid to end of next week would be enough time for everyone). Please specify a date and time that you would like this complete so that everyone can account for it in their own schedules.
Looking forward to reviewing! Thanks,
Brent



Brent A. Bakken

Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
Pearson



512 202 1087
brent.bakken@pearson.com<mailto:brent.bakken@pearson.com>


Learn more at pearson.com<http://pearson.com>



[Pearson]



On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Nic Steenhout <nic@knowbility.org<mailto:nic@knowbility.org>> wrote:
Hello all,

Laura and I have worked on the Selecting Evaluation Tools document. We would appreciate your review and feedback.

The page lives on GitHub and used MultiMarkDown so it should be easy to read and follow without needing a preview.

https://github.com/w3c/wai-selecting-eval-tools/blob/master/index.md


The work involved tersifying and simplifying the language. This led to significant changes to the document. Both Laura and I feel that all the necessary information is there, and easy to find, read and understand. Feedback from the planning committee was taken into account.

We had discussed the possibility of creating a second page with more in-depth information. On further consideration, neither Laura nor I believe this to be necessary.

Thanks all.

Nic