Re: How People with Disabilities use the Web planned revisions and content questions

Just saw this now. Thanks Shawn.



Brent A. Bakken
Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
Pearson

512 202 1087
brent.bakken@pearson.com

Learn more at pearson.com

[image: Pearson]


On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Norah,
>
> All of the information should be public. You can find it by searching.
> (That's what I did for the others. :-)
>
> I did some searching tonight to get you started. :-)
> * Requirements from 2009 revisions: https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/chan
> gelogs/cl-PWD-Use-Web
> * Looks like title discussions happened in 2010, so you can find relevant
> minutes with this is in search engines:
>         site:w3.org/2010 EOWG minutes title how people with disabilities
> use the web
> For example, I found some of the title discussions here:
> ** https://www.w3.org/2010/08/27-eo-minutes#topic4
> ** right *above* https://www.w3.org/2010/10/29-eo-minutes#item03 (that
> is, scroll up from there :)
>
> (Links to all old EOWG minutes are here <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Min
> utes#y2010>.)
>
> Shadi might have other information or pointers related to the titles of
> the pages.
>
> Best,
> ~Shawn
>
>
>
> On 8/30/2017 5:00 PM, Sinclair, Norah M wrote:
>
>> Thanks Brent, this is great. I looked at the example you sent. Are there
>> previous requirements documents to link to and the email thread you mention
>> with previous discussions on name changes? If Shawn has access to that
>> information and wants to create the github issues so the group can begin
>> brainstorming this, that works. I am happy to assist in whatever way to
>> move the discussion along.
>>
>>
>> *Norah Sinclair *
>> Instructional Technology and User Support Specialist
>> **
>> AMAC Accessibility Solutions and Research Center
>> Georgia Institute of Technology | College of Design
>> 512 Means Street | Suite 250 | Atlanta, GA 30318
>>
>> phone 404.894.7432
>> www.amacusg.org <http://www.amacusg.org/>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Bakken, Brent <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 2:14 PM
>> *To:* Sinclair, Norah M; public-eo-archive@w3.org
>> *Subject:* Re: How People with Disabilities use the Web planned revisions
>> and content questions
>> [including public-eo-archive@w3.org <mailto:public-eo-archive@w3.org>]
>>
>> Hi Norah,
>> Thank you so much for your thoughts on this. This is a great start. One
>> key thing that may or may not have been evident from the navigation
>> spreadsheet was that the names that were listed as alternative new names
>> are more of a suggestion to get brainstorming started rather than a
>> "proposal" of what to switch to.
>>
>> So, When you add these two GitHub issues in, I would state the following
>> concepts in the issue (in your own words of course)...
>>
>>   * we need to think about changing the current name of the particular
>> page in the resource
>>   * have people visit the page and read the content prior to making
>> comments in the issue
>>   * you provide the suggested optional name as a means to start the
>> brainstorming
>>   * provide a rationale to support the suggested name
>>
>> Doing this will help others follow suite and provide support for other
>> name suggestions along with rationale for you to consider.
>>
>> I know that some of these names of these resources had some discussion in
>> previous EOWG meetings years ago (before my time) it would be nice to find
>> those minutes and post them as well. I am hoping someone can add that to
>> the issue thread once we get it started.
>>
>> Here is an example of a recent similar issue that Shawn started for the
>> "Essential Components of Web Accessibility" resource. You can pattern yours
>> after this one if you like (title/name issue #1 <
>> https://github.com/w3c/wai-components/issues/1>) adding more context to
>> yours as you see fit.
>>
>> If you think you can get these two issues posted prior to the meeting on
>> Friday, I will also add them to the agenda and Shawn and I will get people
>> started thinking about them along with the others that we are doing the
>> same thing for. Just let me know when you add them and I will update the
>> agenda if possible.
>>
>> I hope this helps. Thank you so much fo keeping at it. You are Awesome.
>> Brent
>>
>> *__*
>>
>> Brent A. Bakken
>> Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
>> Pearson
>>
>> 512 202 1087
>> brent.bakken@pearson.com <mailto:brent.bakken@pearson.com>
>>
>> Learn more at pearson.com <http://pearson.com>
>> Pearson
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Sinclair, Norah M <
>> norah.sinclair@amac.gatech.edu <mailto:norah.sinclair@amac.gatech.edu>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Brent,
>>
>>
>>     Thanks for this information. I apologize that I have not sent this
>> out to reviewers yet. I was out for a couple of days and am catching up. I
>> am working on adding the github issues now.
>>
>>
>>     Do the following work as github issues to send to the reviewers for
>> feedback as you suggested?
>>
>>
>>     Rename Diversity of Web Users
>>     Two of the resources that are part of the larger "How People with
>> Disabilities Use the Web" resource need to be renamed. On the proposed
>> navigation document,  "Diversity of Web Users" is listed as "Diverse
>> Abilities and Disabilities". What are the reviewers thoughts on this
>> proposed title? Are there other suggestions?
>>
>>     https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/people-use-web/diversity <
>> https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/people-use-web/diversity>
>>
>>
>>     Rename Diversity in Web Use
>>     The second resource that is part of "How People with Disabilities Use
>> the Web" is currently titled "Diversity in Web Use" and also needs to be
>> renamed. On the proposed navigation document, "Diversity in Web Use" is
>> listed as "Tools and Techniques People Use". What are the reviewers
>> thoughts on this proposed title? Are there other suggestions?
>>
>>     https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/people-use-web/browsing <
>> https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/people-use-web/browsing>
>>
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>
>>     Norah
>>
>>
>>     *Norah Sinclair *
>>     Instructional Technology and User Support Specialist
>>     **
>>     AMAC Accessibility Solutions and Research Center
>>     Georgia Institute of Technology | College of Design
>>     512 Means Street | Suite 250 | Atlanta, GA 30318
>>
>>     phone 404.894.7432 <tel:(404)%20894-7432>
>>     www.amacusg.org <http://www.amacusg.org/>
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------
>>     *From:* Bakken, Brent <brent.bakken@pearson.com <mailto:
>> brent.bakken@pearson.com>>
>>     *Sent:* Wednesday, August 23, 2017 11:30 AM
>>     *To:* Sinclair, Norah M
>>     *Cc:* Shadi Abou-Zahra; Sylvie Duchateau; Sharron Rush; shawn@w3.org
>> <mailto:shawn@w3.org>
>>     *Subject:* Re: How People with Disabilities use the Web planned
>> revisions and content questions
>>     Hi Norah,
>>
>>     Thank you so much for pulling this recommendation together. Actually,
>> the two pages of the resource that you pointed out needing name changes are
>> on my list to communicate with you about needing the changes. You beat me
>> to it!
>>
>>     I am glad that you have already put some good thought into the new
>> names. We are trying to work through about 5 resources that need to have
>> this complete before we start our usability testing of the site redesign
>> navigation in mid-September. Because of that, it would be good if you could
>> prioritize the task of nailing down the new names for those two pages
>> sometime prior to September 8th so we can feed that information to the
>> person setting up the site for the usability testing.
>>
>>     The best way to get started would be to add your recommendation (with
>> a short rationale) for each page as a new issue in the resources GitHub
>> repository. This will make it easy for you to get feedback. You can just
>> add each as a new issue here on the issues page <
>> https://github.com/w3c/wai-people-use-web/issues>. Once you have the new
>> issues entered for those two pages, you can send out the issue links to the
>> full review team (listed below) and ask for quick feedback so that you can
>> work up a final recommendation for EO. I would give the review team a
>> deadline for feedback so that you receive it sooner rather than later.
>>
>>     If you do not feel comfortable enough with GitHub to add the issues,
>> Shawn mentioned that she would be happy to add them for you. I know you
>> have responded to issues previously, so I am assuming that you are okay
>> with creating two new ones and sending out the links asking for feedback.
>>
>>     Let me know if you need any assistance or have any other ideas on
>> this topic that I can help you with.
>>
>>     Review Team:
>>
>>       * Shadi - shadi@w3.org <mailto:shadi@w3.org>
>>       * Sylvie - sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr <mailto:
>> sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr>
>>       * James - jgreen@visa.com <mailto:jgreen@visa.com>
>>       * Sharron - srush@knowbility.org <mailto:srush@knowbility.org>
>>       * Jesús - jesus.pulido@amac.gatech.edu <http://amac.gatech.edu>
>>       * Shawn - shawn@w3.org <mailto:shawn@w3.org>
>>
>>
>>     Thanks again for working so diligently on this resource.
>>     Brent
>>
>>     *__*
>>
>>     Brent A. Bakken
>>     Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
>>     Pearson
>>
>>     512 202 1087 <tel:(512)%20202-1087>
>>     brent.bakken@pearson.com <mailto:brent.bakken@pearson.com>
>>
>>     Learn more at pearson.com <http://pearson.com>
>>     Pearson
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Sinclair, Norah M <
>> norah.sinclair@amac.gatech.edu <mailto:norah.sinclair@amac.gatech.edu>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>         I apologize that I was not able to complete the survey before it
>> closed yesterday. I agree that the names of the resources, Diversity of Web
>> Users, Diversity in Web Use should be changed. The proposed revised titles,
>> [Diverse Abilities and Disabilities] and [Tools and Techniques People Use]
>> look like better options. I had not seen that information previously.
>>
>>
>>         *Norah Sinclair *
>>         Instructional Technology and User Support Specialist
>>         **
>>         AMAC Accessibility Solutions and Research Center
>>         Georgia Institute of Technology | College of Design
>>         512 Means Street | Suite 250 | Atlanta, GA 30318
>>
>>         phone 404.894.7432 <tel:(404)%20894-7432>
>>         www.amacusg.org <http://www.amacusg.org/>
>>
>>
>>         ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------
>>         *From:* Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org <mailto:shadi@w3.org>>
>>         *Sent:* Tuesday, August 22, 2017 4:06 PM
>>         *To:* Sinclair, Norah M; Sylvie Duchateau; Bakken, Brent; Sharron
>> Rush; shawn@w3.org <mailto:shawn@w3.org>
>>         *Subject:* Re: How People with Disabilities use the Web planned
>> revisions and content questions
>>         Hi Norah,
>>
>>         I agree that the other sections are more concise and have an
>> active
>>         tone. I recall Sharron still had some concerns, especially with
>> the
>>         principles page. I think it may be the current one-page
>> presentation
>>         that is creating this perceived wall of text, so maybe your idea
>> of
>>         adding graphics could help. I also don't know how the new WAI
>> design
>>         addresses these types of pages in terms of information
>> architecture.
>>
>>         As to contacting CoGa, they already have been contacted maybe
>> over a
>>         year ago meanwhile. While terminology and technology has moved
>> most
>>         significantly in this area, I think also the other sections have
>> aged
>>         and should probably be looked over by relevant experts. Not sure
>> how
>>         this should be best approached, though. Maybe the chairs have
>> ideas.
>>
>>         Best,
>>             Shadi
>>
>>
>>         On 22/08/2017 20:58, Sinclair, Norah M wrote:
>>         > Hello Shadi, Sylvie, Brent, Sharron, and Shawn,
>>         >         > The resource, “How People with Disabilities Use the
>> Web,” consists of several in-depth pages, including Stories of Web Users,
>> Diversity of Web Users, Diversity in Web Use and Accessibility Principles.
>> The co-editors are seeking to:
>>         > • Simplify & Tersify — Make content simple and brief. Cut
>> words. Cut Sentences.
>>         > • Bullets & Graphics — Break up passages into bullets when
>> appropriate. Suggest graphics.
>>         > • Front-loaded Action — Use active voice, and action statements.
>>         >         > We have determined this process is needed for Stories
>> of Web Users and we’ve agreed upon a draft format for the first story,
>> which basically reduces the word count in half while conveying the
>> important content from the original story. The other stories are  currently
>> being revised using the same type of approach.
>>         >         > To me, the other resources, Diversity of Web Users,
>> Diversity in Web Use and Accessibility Principles may not be in need of the
>> same type of revision (goal of reducing content by 50% or so).  The content
>> of these resources (Diversity of Web Users, Diversity  in Web Use and
>> Accessibility Principles) is broken up into bullets, and is written using
>> active, action statements. The main revision could be adding graphics or
>> linking to the web perspective videos. What are the thoughts of the
>> co-editors and EO chair review team on this? Would this be a good question
>> to ask the reviewers for their feedback?
>>         >         > Also, should the Cognitive and Learning Disabilities
>> Accessibility Task Force (Cognitive A11Y TF) be consulted for suggested
>> revisions to section: Examples of cognitive, learning, and neurological
>> disabilities?
>>         >         > https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/people-use-web/diversity
>> <https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/people-use-web/diversity>
>>         >         > Thanks very much,
>>         > Norah
>>         >         > Norah Sinclair
>>         > Instructional Technology and User Support Specialist
>>         >         > AMAC Accessibility Solutions and Research Center
>>         > Georgia Institute of Technology | College of Design
>>         > 512 Means Street | Suite 250 | Atlanta, GA 30318
>>         >         > phone 404.894.7432 <tel:(404)%20894-7432>
>>         > www.amacusg.org <http://www.amacusg.org><http:
>> //www.amacusg.org/ <http://www.amacusg.org/>>
>>         >
>>         --         Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ <
>> http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/>
>>         Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist
>>         Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
>>         World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
>>
>>
>>
>>

Received on Thursday, 31 August 2017 13:59:50 UTC