Re: Pencil & Paper / StratML

Gannon

I have been thinking validation lately, and all the possible implications
of validity

I looked at the link you sent under the same heading
http://www.rustprivacy.org/2012/xsd/egADMS/

and liked the links to various formats,

is this a process that you are suggesting/describing/creating called 'pen
and paper. aka manually editing
a file to make it valid?


thanks

PDM


On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I wanted to post this before the ISWC got underway.
>
> background
> ========
> When I was in College, the half-life of an engineering degree was said to
> be five years.  Half of the (new) technology vocabulary would be obsolete
> in five years.  This may be better or worse in some disciplines, but still
> largely true for the foreseeable future.  This is not just a problem for
> STEM Graduates, but for the young who don't know and for the retired no
> longer connected to full time work and the familiarity with new technology
> that brings.
>
> Security concerns around Cross-Platform Validation were never "solved" so
> much as overcome.  So, Pencil & Paper (manual editing) is not a new
> Luddism, it is simply transparentcy which may highlight and mitigate risks
> from predatory behavior unforeseen but for continueing education.
>
> Social Networking, Linked Data and the Semantic Web are by no means
> immune.  The concept of retroactive bad choices is not itself very old, as
> bad a concept as it is turning out to be.
>
> ================
>
> I posted Pencil & Paper examples for StratML, with XHTML 1.0 ... ADMS used
> XHTML 1.1
>
> http://www.rustprivacy.org/2012/xsd/stratml/
>
> --Gannon
>
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
> *To:* eGov IG (Public) <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 8, 2012 3:53 PM
> *Subject:* Pencil & Paper
>
> Where confidentiality requirements are temporary a complex,
> ready-for-anything firewall can be replaced by inside source control
> generated XML.  This can be brought home, commented, marked up, validated,
> spell checked, etc. then taken back to work stripped of commentary, tagged
> marginalia and checked back in.  None of this requires any modification of
> the specifications (W3C or even IETF) or third-party supervision.
>
> An example of an ADMS Repository is here:
> http://www.rustprivacy.org/2012/xsd/egADMS/
>
> I have similar documentation for MODS, JATS, StratML etc. as mentioned
> below.
>
> --Gannon
>
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
> *To:* eGov IG (Public) <public-egov-ig@w3.org>; Phil Archer <
> phil@philarcher.org>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 7, 2012 12:36 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Prepublication Public Sector Information (was: Data Mining
> / Cloud Computing)
>
> Hi Phil and All,
>
> ======earlier======
> Using Xerces, I've been able to validate (entirely off-line) XML Documents
> in the following formats:  StratML, JATS Journal Publishing (ANSI), JATS
> Article Authoring (ANSI), MODS (US LOC), DWML (NOAA) as well as embedded
> versions in XHTML 1.1.  As soon as I am able to publish examples I will
> (along with a zip file containing the interlinked XSD Sxhema.  This method
> is not as "good" as DTD's, but it is much smaller and gets the basics right.
> ================
>
> https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ADMS-enabled%20Federation%20of%20Semantic%20Asset%20Repositories_Brochure_1.pdf
>
>
> If I were going to add ADMS XML as an example, which flavor would you
> suggest ?  Please don't say "all of them" unless you have too much money
> cluttering up your desk :-)
>
> --Gannon
>
>
>
>
>
>