- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:57:17 +0100
- To: "eGov IG (Public)" <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SotvQsSvz4f1cpCVOUibe8_Rfc1o+rXXR-PH7QscksSyw@mail.gmail.com>
Few more thoughts : Not sure if this is the best way to share thinking, but here is an open/editable braindump that aims to tackle the integration aspect of the issues at stake I am trying to say on Tomasz proposed separation of issues: https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1kWtUzVI17dwI4e22Kl7wdJ4AxmwO6lOTnQ6ElqktqRs/edit that we should aimto tackle e-governance 'as a whole'to make it happen (Please note I have a complex socio technical system of systems perspective/bias ) 1. Information technology (IT, the web, the internet) are horizontal 'enablers' for each of the phases (taking as an example those identified by T). That is, networked, distributed technical functionalities and processes can be applied to develop the themes in synergy, and to make sure they are cross referenced 2. what depends on why, and how depends on the relation between what-why , so we should consider the what- why-how- when- who- as a single key, if we want to slam this particular door open 3. similarly, consider the possible algorithm: sustainability of e-governance is achieved if: planning IS driven by design, design is carried out to support implementation (and planning) , which are determined by operations, (not definitive, just offered as discussion - the relations between these domains/themes should be extricated and represented correctly in our mission statement) P
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:07:54 UTC