- From: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:07:24 -0800 (PST)
- To: Tim McNamara <paperless@timmcnamara.co.nz>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: "eGov IG \(Public\)" <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
+1 from me ... as long as we have Messrs. Sarkozy and Obama forgetting their kindergarten lessons about "indoor voices" I think Tweets and other information pushes could use some differentiation rules. --Gannon ----- Original Message ----- From: Tim McNamara <paperless@timmcnamara.co.nz> To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> Cc: eGov IG (Public) <public-egov-ig@w3.org> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 2:40 PM Subject: Re: Twitter use by elected officials -1 from me. Hansard records debates. Interjections and such are not included. On 12 November 2011 09:22, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > One of the discussions during the face to face meeting the other day > concerned elected officials' use of social media. Many western legislators > now routinely tweet from the floor of their house. We discussed whether such > public statements should or should not be part of the public record - > probably above our pay grades - but suppose they, or anyone, wanted to > archive their Tweets and other social media: how would they do it? > > But the news about Icelandic MP Birgitta Jonsdottir having her Twitter > account forced open by the US courts raised another issue in my mind. In > Britain, MPs in the House of Commons are protected under something called > Parliamentary Privilege which means they can say what they like without fear > of prosecution for slander/defamation (or anything else). > > That may be a legal rather than a tech matter, but, *if* we do look at this > issue (and I would find it fascinating personally), then it's the kind of > thing we might have to bear in mind. > > What I actually have in mind for this group, potentially, is a best > practices doc that talks about archiving of social media updates and tries > to distil common points from the various codes of conduct springing up in > parliaments around the world. > > Just ruminating... > > Phil. > > [1] > http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/11/us-verdict-privacy-wikileaks-twitter > > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C eGovernment > http://www.w3.org/egov/ > > http://philarcher.org > @philarcher1 > >
Received on Friday, 11 November 2011 21:07:53 UTC