Re: eGov @ W3C Renewal

+1

Daniel Bennett
CTO, eCitizen Foundation
daniel@citizencontact.com





On 4/29/2011 10:56 AM, Brand Niemann wrote:
>
> +1 Brand
>
> *From:*public-egov-ig-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-egov-ig-request@w3.org] *On Behalf Of *rachel.flagg@gsa.gov
> *Sent:* Friday, April 29, 2011 10:02 AM
> *To:* gannon_dick@yahoo.com
> *Cc:* W3C eGovAnnouncements; W3C eGov Interest Group (All); 
> public-egov-ig-request@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: eGov @ W3C Renewal
>
>
> +1
>
> -Rachel(invited expert)
> -------------------------------
> Rachel Flagg
> Co-Chair, Federal Web Managers Council
> Center for Excellence in Digital Government
> Office of Citizen Services and Innovative Technologies
> U.S. General Services Administration
> rachel.flagg@gsa.gov <mailto:rachel.flagg@gsa.gov>
> HowTo.gov <http://www.howto.gov/>-- Helping agencies deliver a great 
> customer experience
>
>
>
> *Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com <mailto:gannon_dick@yahoo.com>>*
> Sent by: public-egov-ig-request@w3.org 
> <mailto:public-egov-ig-request@w3.org>
>
> 04/28/2011 09:23 PM
>
> 	
>
> To
>
> 	
>
> "W3C eGov Interest Group \(All\)" <public-egov-ig@w3.org 
> <mailto:public-egov-ig@w3.org>>, W3C eGovAnnouncements 
> <public-egov-announce@w3.org <mailto:public-egov-announce@w3.org>>
>
> cc
>
> 	
>
> Subject
>
> 	
>
> Re: eGov @ W3C Renewal
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
> +1
>
> --- On Thu, 4/28/11, Chris Beer <chris@e-beer.net.au 
> <mailto:chris@e-beer.net.au>> wrote:
>
> > From: Chris Beer <chris@e-beer.net.au <mailto:chris@e-beer.net.au>>
> > Subject: Re: eGov @ W3C Renewal
> > To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org <mailto:sandro@w3.org>>
> > Cc: "W3C eGov Interest Group (All)" <public-egov-ig@w3.org 
> <mailto:public-egov-ig@w3.org>>, "W3C eGovAnnouncements" 
> <public-egov-announce@w3.org <mailto:public-egov-announce@w3.org>>
> > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2011, 10:55 PM
> > On behalf of the Invited Expert
> > (Public Members) participants to the W3C e-Government
> > Interest Group I would like to strongly urge member
> > organizations to support the continuing work of the W3C in
> > this space.
> >
> > Many of us come from within Government and Academia, often
> > where our respective employers cannot or will not become
> > member organizations. None the less, the work of the IG has
> > been instrumental in not only facilitating the free exchange
> > of ideas and promotion of W3C standards between countries
> > and agencies, but has been somewhat instrumental in the move
> > towards Linked Open Data and the data.gov.* efforts by
> > Governments worldwide.
> >
> > Please support our continued work in these very exciting
> > times for Government in an online world.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Chris Beer
> > Invited Expert (Public Member)
> >
> > On 29/04/2011, at 12:13, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org 
> <mailto:sandro@w3.org>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Reminder - the review period for whether W3C should
> > continue with eGov
> > > work ends Friday, 29 April (today/tomorrow).  W3C
> > member organizations
> > > [1] can weigh in, through their AC Representative [2]
> > at this
> > > access-controlled form:
> > >
> > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/egov2011/
> > >
> > > Reviews are very important as the decision is made, in
> > the next few
> > > days, concerning how to allocation resources for the
> > next two years.
> > >
> > >      -- Sandro Hawke,  W3C
> > eGovernment Activity Lead
> > >
> > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List
> > > [2] AC Rep contact information, for people with Member
> > Access:
> > > http://www.w3.org/Member/ACList
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>