Re: Wireless human pollution

Thank you for the suggestion to submit to et.gov, Owen.  My only wish is that 
there were some form of guaranteed compensation for such an idea should it ever 
excel by way of a springboard like et.gov.  I submitted my idea pro forma and 
non-provisional to the Patent Office; unfortunately, its technical expression 
did not suffice for patent protection without a re-write, something of which I 
found to be too overwhelming at time of rejection.  
 
Michael A. Norton
 




________________________________
From: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
To: Mike Norton <xsideofparadise@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tue, September 28, 2010 8:38:06 PM
Subject: RE: Wireless human pollution

 
Mike, you could consider making a submission to http://et.gov/ identifying a 
radiation signaling system as an emerging technology of potential interest to 
.gov and .mil agencies.  (The technology does not have to exist yet in order to 
be conceptually identified.)
 
Owen Ambur
Co-Chair, AIIM StratML Committee
Co-Chair Emeritus, xml.gov CoP
Communications/Membership Director, FIRM
Former Project Mananger, ET.gov
Invited Expert, W3C eGov IG
 
 
From:public-egov-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-egov-ig-request@w3.org] On 
Behalf Of Mike Norton
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 10:25 PM
To: Submit to W3C Egov IG
Subject: Wireless human pollution
 
Is there a grain of truth to this article?[1]  If so, can meta-data be utilized 
to produce ubiquitous visual signalling systems to alert our end-users?  
 
Is this worth a Working Group?  Or a submission to the forthcoming W3C 
Challenges contest?
 
[1] http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7025
 
Michael A. Norton