- From: Chris Beer <chris@e-beer.net.au>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:36:38 +1100
- To: Hugh Barnes <Hugh.Barnes@nehta.gov.au>
- Cc: Eyal Sela <eyal@isoc.org.il>, "<public-egov-ig@w3.org>" <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
True - should get a mention. Open standard too so no issues there. Example use case would be good too. Chris Beer (iPhone) On 26/11/2010, at 10:14, "Hugh Barnes" <Hugh.Barnes@nehta.gov.au> wrote: > Hi > >> From: public-egov-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-egov-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Eyal Sela >> Sent: Thursday, 25 November 2010 11:46 PM >> To: public-egov-ig@w3.org >> Subject: Recommending publishing data as JSON [in: Publishing Open Government Data] >> >> Hello all, >> I was wondering why you do not mention JSON as a possible format for publishing data. >> Is it because it might impede progress to publishing RDF? >> >> In my opinion, not mentioning it might cause you to lose audience. Namely, people who are less familiar with XML, and might think that 'this document/approach is not for them'. > > This occurred to me yesterday, maybe because there's been an interesting thread quite recently about JSON in APIs with some big XML personalities [1], [2]. I'm personally an XML zealot, but I can see JSON has a place in straightforward situations where there's no danger of requirements changing (pretty much what Norm says). I don't like dropping XML, though, and I suspect GLD wouldn't get by without its expressive power. > >> If indeed you dilatorily do not mention JSON, I'd suggest writing a paragraph that explains XML's advantages over it, and maybe stating that throughout the document you will relate to XML, but JSON (And other formats) are also possible to use. > > Agree. > > Cheers > > Hugh Barnes > Technical Interface Specialist > nehta – National E-Health Transition Authority > Address: Level 2, 10 Browning St, West End, QLD, 4101 > Phone: +61 7 3023 8537 > Mobile: +61 417 469 552 > Email: hugh.barnes@nehta.gov.au > Web: http://www.nehta.gov.au > > > [1] http://norman.walsh.name//2010/11/17/deprecatingXML > [2] http://blog.jclark.com/2010/11/xml-vs-web_24.html > >
Received on Thursday, 25 November 2010 23:36:45 UTC