- From: Chris Beer <chris@e-beer.net.au>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:32:43 +1100
- To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Cc: "public-egov-ig@w3.org" <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
+1 the focus needs to be e-Gov, not just LOD. Chris Beer (iPhone) On 24/11/2010, at 4:32, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote: > I am interested in continuing participation in this group. I think > having a w3c group that's focused on the use of web technologies in > government is incredibly important. > > However, I am not interested in the group focusing exclusively on > Linked Data (aka RDF, SPARQL). I think we need to look at the role of > egov in the web ecosystem in a holistic and pragmatic way. For > example, I am interested in promoting the the thoughtful use of feed > syndication in egov. This seems to fall outside the scope of what > people typically mean when they say Linked Data. Yet I think > syndication is incredibly important when it comes to timely > distribution of egov information. > > I'm also interested in getting government institutions to embrace > putting their "hugged" databases online, with thoughtful use of URLs, > with machine (as well as human) readable data at those URLs, so that > we can start to get more "registries" online. Once people have made > the leap to putting their data online, with persistent cool URLs, then > we can start talking RDF, etc. > > Perhaps I'm jumping to conclusions that there would ever be such a > focus exclusively on Linked Data. I thought I heard rumblings of > rechartering with a focus on Linked Data, and I would like to go on > record as opposing that sort of move -- if it were to be proposed :-) > > //Ed >
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 19:32:50 UTC