Streamlining public data - 3 options

Thanks Sandro - I guess I will try to post again.  here's the email:

> Hello all,
> 
> 
> As a way to streamline business data repositories that are publicly
> available into federally specified schemes, please follow [1] and hit
> me a reply with which scenario you think would do the most sufficient
> job.  Of course, if you have a better one, by all means let me know.
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.rustprivacy.org/norton/pub.xml
> 
> 
> Cheers,
>  
> Michael A. Norton

 




________________________________
From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
To: Mike Norton <xsideofparadise@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tue, November 9, 2010 9:02:50 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Streamlining public data - 3 options

On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 08:50 -0800, Mike Norton wrote:
> 
> Hi Sandro,
>  
> Would you please explain to me why this email never got posted to the
> list?

I have no idea, sorry.  I haven't heard a report of a problem with our
mail servers like that in many years.  Usually people find the mail
blocked in their outgoing queue, or something.  Or if they send it from
a different e-mail address, then it needs to go through several
anti-spam steps.

  -- Sandro


> Thanks!
>  
> Michael A. Norton
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Forwarded Message ----
> From: Mike Norton <xsideofparadise@yahoo.com>
> To: Submit to W3C Egov IG <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
> Sent: Mon, November 8, 2010 9:27:49 AM
> Subject: Streamlining public data - 3 options
> 
> 
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> 
> As a way to streamline business data repositories that are publicly
> available into federally specified schemes, please follow [1] and hit
> me a reply with which scenario you think would do the most sufficient
> job.  Of course, if you have a better one, by all means let me know.
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.rustprivacy.org/norton/pub.xml
> 
> 
> Cheers,
>  
> Michael A. Norton
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>