Re: Censorship?

Chris,

>> (That's not to say someone won't build a User Agent with some sort of in built 
>>semantic URI parser - which is a far more likely realisation of your suggestion 
>>Mike, and one I wouldn't mind seeing

That's exactly what I was trying to get at in writing my patent application - a 
user agent - web browser - that navigated the new federal TLD space which would 
extract statistical data and transform it into audio-visual displays about 
wherever the user was navigating on the traditional web.

>>I think that Mikes' proposal raises a few interesting points that are well worth 
>>discussion by any modern e-government. Namely : In the world of today's 
>>internet, and the future semantic web, what does a URI look like? Or rather, 
>>what does your e-governments' online information architecture look like? Is 
>>there as consistent standard structure to your URI's that assist citizens in 
>>finding information quickly and semantically? And is there any actual benefit to 
>>this?

Thanks!   If such a User Agent were ever to emerge, I think the relevance of the 
URI would diminish greatly, whereas the user will eventually just have to type 
"Microsoft" rather having to type "www.Microsoft.com" or such.

Mr. Waites,

>>What does this have to do with censorship?

That was in reference to an email I sent (twice) to the eGov list but never got 
published which is this:
 
From: Mike Norton <xsideofparadise@yahoo.com>
>>>To: Submit to W3C Egov IG <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
>>>Sent: Mon, November 8, 2010 9:27:49 AM
>>>Subject: Streamlining public data - 3 options
>>>
>>>
>>>Hello all,
>>>
>>>
>>>As a way to streamline business data repositories that are publicly available 
>>>into federally specified schemes, please follow [1] and hit me a reply with 
>>>which scenario you think would do the most sufficient job.  Of course, if you 
>>>have a better one, by all means let me know.   Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>>[1] http://www.rustprivacy.org/norton/pub.xml
>>>
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>> 
>>>Michael A. Norton
>>>   
Hope to hear your comments!



Cheers,

Michael A. Norton
 


>