- From: Martin Alvarez <martin.alvarez@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 22:42:09 +0200
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: public-egov-ig IG <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
Hello Richard, Those changes I told you are trivial, just to complete the descriptions, ranges, and domains of the properties. I agree the best way is to edit the wiki directly. Best, Martin On 20/05/2010, at 18:58, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: > Martin, > > On 19 May 2010, at 22:14, Martin Alvarez wrote: >> Thanks for this info. I would like to add some comments on the >> vocabulary reference [1] (just little descriptions to enrich >> properties and classes). Should I edit the wiki? Or, should I send >> these comments to you and the list? > > If you feel that your changes are likely to be uncontroversial, then > please edit the reference document in the wiki directly, and give us > a short summary of your changes afterwards here on the list. Would > that work for you? > > Best, > Richard > > > >> >> Thanks in advance, and good work. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Martin >> >> >> On 19/05/2010, at 18:38, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> >> wrote: >> >>> Just a heads-up that the next dcat teleconference will be *next* >>> week, on May 27th. >>> >>> We're still waiting for feedback on the Use Cases and Requirements >>> [1] from a number of parties. >>> >>> Meanwhile, the Vocabulary Reference (work in progress at [2]) is >>> progressing nicely, but it still needs some work before it's worth >>> discussing it in detail. >>> >>> Best, >>> Richard >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/Data_Catalog_Vocabulary/Use_Cases_and_Requirements >>> [2] http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/Data_Catalog_Vocabulary/Vocabulary_Reference >>> >
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2010 20:43:05 UTC