Re: [agenda] eGov IG Call, 12 May 2010 -- SemWeb, eGov and FlashForwards

Daniel, my fault. I forgot to add it. Will do at the beginning of the  
call. Please, remind me.

J.


El 12/05/2010, a las 14:23, Daniel Bennett escribió:

> Perhaps if it didnt make this weeks agenda we can have a short  
> discussion of my project for public meeting notice and agendas at  
> the next meeting or at a special time. http://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dfxgcdfc_224fvq2mwgv
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 5/12/2010 6:04 AM, Jose Manuel Alonso wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Sorry for the late agenda.
>>
>> We won't host a seminar-style call today. Instead of that and given  
>> the lively on-list discussion about the future of the group and the  
>> usefulness of SemWeb technologies for eGov, meeting will be focus  
>> on both topics. I know you all will come with an open mind and will  
>> be constructive. Bear in mind that I want to discuss the topic of  
>> willingness vs. reality check (e.g. why so many people said they  
>> would work on a given item and they didn't or why dcat work is a  
>> sucess so far).
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>> Agenda, eGov IG Call, 12 May 2010
>> 13:00Z (9:00EST, 14:00GMT, 15:00CET)
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Chair: Jose
>> Scribe: ?
>>
>> 1. Scribe
>> + need a volunteer, please!
>>
>> 2. Agenda adjustments and next meetings
>> + next meetings: 26 May 2010, 9 Jun 2010
>> + next scribe
>> + next topics for seminar-style
>>
>> 3. What's our goal as group and how should we achieve it?
>> + please, review:
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/06/eGov/ig-charter
>> http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/Projects
>>
>> 4. SemWeb & eGov: past, present, flashforwards
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-egov-ig/2010May/0005
>> + those who have them, bring your real-world examples
>> + skepticism is also welcome
>>
>> 5. What's going on / coming up
>>
>>
>> Telcon instructions:
>> http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/Teleconferences
>>
>>
>> disclaimer: I'm not a FlashForward (the TV series) fan but thought  
>> it was a funny analogy...
>>
>