- From: Peter Krantz <peter.krantz@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:29:27 +0100
- To: rufus.pollock@okfn.org
- Cc: Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray@okfn.org>, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>, OKFN Help <okfn-help@lists.okfn.org>, eGov IG <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 13:14, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock@okfn.org> wrote: > > > Peter: I know we're already in contact regarding CKAN and > opengov-catalog stuff. Using an Atom-based format like the one you > outline above might be a good wayt to start pushing and pulling info > between the two systems? Let's try it out! The only thing that differs I guess is that the opengov catalogs will contain datasets that are not (yet) considered open and that we need a way to distinguish those from the pure ones that CKAN is interested in. So license type may be a key area to agree on. In earlier discussions I have been thinking about a process model where opengov-catalogs highlight datasets and discussion around those in order to make them open (and transferable to CKAN). As soon as I manage to find some more VoiD examples for simple datasets in our use case it should be fairly straigtforward. Are there VoiD people here that could provide some pointers? Regards, Peter
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 12:30:01 UTC