- From: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:22:00 -0500
- To: "'eGov IG'" <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
- Message-id: <006e01c9880a$13d61ee0$3b825ca0$@Ambur@verizon.net>
The eGov IG's draft Group Note poses the question "What Data?" should be made available: http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/Group/docs/note#What I agree with the views of Vivek Kundra, who is reportedly in line for appointment as administrator for e-government and information technology in the Office of Management and Budget in the Obama administration. See the quotations attributed to him in last paragraph of the article at http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20090204_5457.php The obvious answer is that *all* public information should be made readily available to the public in readily reusable (XML) format. The U.S. the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lists nine exemptions covering the types of information that should *not* be made public: http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/foi-act.htm One of President Obama's first acts in the White House was to issue guidance stating: All agencies should adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure, in order to renew their commitment to the principles embodied in FOIA, and to usher in a new era of open Government. The presumption of disclosure should be applied to all decisions involving FOIA. The presumption of disclosure also means that agencies should take affirmative steps to make information public. They should not wait for specific requests from the public. All agencies should use modern technology to inform citizens about what is known and done by their Government. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Freedom_of_Information_Act/ The latter statements essentially restate what Congress has already enshrined in law, in the E-FOIA amendments, which are highlighted in bold at: http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/foia_updates/Vol_XVII_4/page2.htm Recall, too, that in the eGov Act, Congress took the highly unusual step of explicitly citing a technical standard for sharing information, namely "extensible markup language". See the text highlighted in red at http://xml.gov/documents/completed/eGovXML.htm The direction that has been given is quite clear. The only question is what new excuses will be made for not moving out forthrightly to following it. Owen Ambur Co-Chair Emeritus, xmlCoP <http://xml.gov/index.asp> Co-Chair, AIIM StratML <http://xml.gov/stratml/index.htm> Committee Member, AIIM iECM Committee <http://www.aiim.org/Standards/article.aspx?ID=29284> Invited Expert, W3C eGov <http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/> IG Membership Director, FIRM Board <http://firmcouncil.org/id5.html> Former Project Manager, ET.gov <http://et.gov/> Brief Bio <http://ambur.net/bio.htm>
Received on Friday, 6 February 2009 03:23:14 UTC