Re: conceptual model for public service

On Nov 6, 2008, at 11:04 AM, public-egov-ig@w3.org wrote:

> Thanks for doing this, Jeff.

it is just a very-rough start
if folks seriously want to develop a data structure
and a controlled vocabulary
within which to express ideas

feedback from anyone on
how this could be structured or constrained
to become a more useful tool to organize their thinking?

> As far as the glossary is concerned, I'll be interested to learn  
> whether
> there are good reasons not to use the W3C's SKOS --
> http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/

say some more about that please

> BTW, if RIT has a strategic plan, I'd like to render it in StratML  
> format
> for inclusion in our collection at
> http://xml.gov/stratml/index.htm#EdInstitutions  Although there are  
> now more
> than 370 plans in the collection, thus far we only have a  
> couple .edu plans.

I'll look into this
after next week's end-of-term exams
and the subsequent grading frenzy
<grin/>

jeffs

--
"I don't want to be taken to your leader.
   I've already met him."
- Eddie Gaedel -
============

Prof. Jeff Sonstein

http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/
http://chw.rit.edu/blog/
http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/emailDisclaimer.html

Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 23:56:24 UTC