- From: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:27:12 -0400
- To: "'Jose M. Alonso'" <josema@w3.org>, <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: "Adam Schwartz" <aschwartz@gpo.gov>, "Betsy Fanning" <bfanning@aiim.org>, "'Sylvia Webb'" <smwebb@MSN.COM>, "Betty Harvey" <harvey@eccnet.com>, "Ron Reck" <rreck@rrecktek.com>, "'Joe Carmel'" <joe.carmel@comcast.net>
I'm glad to hear that you're back and fired up and ready to go, Jose. I hate to wait another month to have another eGov IG telecon, but if we can use the listserv and wiki to get some activities underway, that would be fine with me. The means that we use to do our work are not so important as the results we produce. In that regard, meetings/telecons are usually more conducive to motivating folks to do some work than they are to actually performing the work itself. So I hope folks don't take the lack of a telecon as an excuse either: a) not to commit to doing anything for another month, or b) wait until just before the next telecon to do that to which they may have volunteered to commit their effort. BTW, there are now about 320 plans in the StratML collection: http://xml.gov/stratml/index.htm#WorkResults One of the tasks I would like to perform for the eGov IG is to further flesh out its strategic plan -- http://xml.gov/stratml/WEIG.xml -- into a performance plan. Since AIIM's StratML Committee has not yet specified the extensions to the StratML core schema covering the elements of performance plans, I won't be able to compile a full-blown performance plan for the IG. However, the minimum requirement for a strategic plan to become a performance plan is to designate for each performance objective a <Stakeholder> of the leader/manager performer type. That I can do with the existing schema and supporting eForms tools. All that I need is: a) the names and brief descriptions of any, more explicit performance objectives than those already expressed in the eGov IG's charter, and b) the names of the folks who have volunteered to take the lead in the performance of the necessary tasks to accomplish those objectives. It would also be helpful to have a brief description of *how* they intend to conduct each task, but that is not essential since the results will speak for themselves. Owen -----Original Message----- From: public-egov-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-egov-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jose M. Alonso Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 7:45 AM To: public-egov-ig@w3.org Subject: today's call canceled, 3 September next? Dear all, Just back from vacation. I don't see much activity in the list, and Kevin and I had to deal with some personal matters and couldn't get an agenda to you on time. I'm sorry about the late message. I prefer to cancel this call instead of having it without enough preparation. Next one would be 20 August, but I guess many will be on vacation, so we should probably skip that one, too. Unless someone feels strongly against it, I propose to resume calls on 3 September and I encourage those around until then to use the mailing list and wiki in the meantime. I hope we'll be able to provide an interesting agenda for you for that one and suggestions are always welcome. Don't wait for us to do it, just tell us! In any case, I'm now full of energy. Be aware! ;) Jose. -- Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org> W3C/CTIC eGovernment Lead http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 13:27:59 UTC