- From: Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 20:23:48 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Hugh Barnes <Hugh.Barnes@nehta.gov.au>, Rachel Flagg <rachel.flagg@hud.gov>, public-egov-ig-etf@w3.org
El 07/09/2009, a las 17:19, Sandro Hawke escribió: >> El 04/09/2009, a las 14:42, Hugh Barnes escribi=F3: >>> Rachel wrote on Fri 4/09/2009 5:47 AM: >>> >>>> Hugh has graciously volunteered to do the HTML work on this doc - >>>> =20 >>> so, Hugh, I believe you can >start work on this now...just >>> recognize =20= >> >>> that the references at the end are still being populated. >If any >>> =20 >>> of you would like to assist Hugh, reply back to this email & let >>> us =20= >> >>> know. >>> >>> Thanks for confirming this, Rachel. It can be hard to be sure =20 >>> exactly what I committed to in those calls (they are too late for >>> me). >>> >> >> :) >> >> Formatting the Google document according to the W3C document format >> =20 >> and Manual of Style, such as the one of the Group Note. >> >>> Will send this to you by the end of my weekend, hopefully. As I =20 >>> understand it, that's within your expectations? >>> >> Yup, is it available somewhere? >> Today (Monday) is a holiday in the U.S. >> Tomorrow (Tuesday) is a local holiday for me. >> >> Unless the document is already properly formatted, it would be nearly >> impossible for Sandro to publish it tomorrow... > > Hugh did the basic formatting, but we're still missing various > editorial > bits, like the references section. If I don't have them in the next > few > hours, it's unlikely we'll be able to proceed on the planned schedule. > > Alternatively, I suppose we could publish with references TBD, but I'm > not really happy with that idea. Glossary TBD is more okay. [I've just subscribed John and Kevin to this list, since I realized they were not] This is an attempt from the top of my head, not sure if enough and on time... We should refer to the eGov Glossary we maintain at: http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/Glossary this is what we did from the Group Note. References... I would use just a few main ones: [EGOV-IMPROVING] Improving Access to Government through Better Use of the Web, S. Accar, J. Alonso, K. Novak, Editors, W3C Group Note, 12 May 2009, http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-egov-improving-20090512/ . Latest version available at http://www.w3.org/TR/egov-improving/. [EU-PSID] Directive 2003/98/EC on the Re-Use of Public Sector Information, European Parliament and Council, 17 November 2003, http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/docs/pdfs/directive/psi_directive_en.pdf . [TBL-GOV] Design Issues: Putting Government Data Online, T. Berners-Lee, http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/GovData [TBL-LD] Design Issues: Linked Data, T. Berners-Lee, http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData [TUT-LD] How to Publish Linked Data on the Web, C. Bizer, R. Cyganiak, T. Heath, 27 July 2007, http://sites.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/suhl/bizer/pub/LinkedDataTutorial/20070727/ . Latest version available at http://sites.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/suhl/bizer/pub/LinkedDataTutorial/ . [US-OBMEMO] Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies on Transparency and Open Government, B. Obama, http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/ . [US-GSATRAN] Intergovernmental Solutions Newsletter: Transparency and Open Government, GSA Office of Citizen Services and Communications, Spring 2009 Issue, http://www.usaservices.gov/events_news/documents/Transparency_000.pdf . [WEBARCH] Architecture of the World Wide Web, Volume One, I. Jacobs, N. Walsh, Editors, W3C Recommendation, 15 December 2005, http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-webarch-20041215/ . Latest version available at http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/. [WEBSELF] The Self-Describing Web, N. Walsh, Editor, W3C TAG Finding, 7 February 2009, http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/ selfDescribingDocuments-2009-02-07. Latest version at http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/selfDescribingDocuments . -- Josema ps: I very much hope we could improve the group's publication process and avoid rushing next time (though some say it's inherent nature of the human being ;) > > -- Sandro
Received on Monday, 7 September 2009 18:24:31 UTC