Re: Meeting agenda for TPAC

Ok, you have to choose one of each, each time, right? If that is the case
then it seems like a generic/default is missing in both specs for all cases
not covered by these options. For example, if the user enters a title in a
field, that would not be covered by "search", nor "keyword" nor any of the
other available options, or how is this to be understood?

On 24 Oct 2017 4:45 pm, "Dave Tapuska" <dtapuska@chromium.org> wrote:

inputmode can definitely be used for long form. Say you are entering some
context aware area of the editable region. Modifying the inputmode on the
content editable will adjust the current virtual keyboard.

I don't expect the inputmode-action to be as useful on long form. We are
restricted on iOS and Android of what text to put there so the range is
also limited but for a long form you could think that a send might be
useful if say you were building an email app.

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Johannes Wilm <johanneswilm@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I agree with you.
>
> Q: Are these also meant for long form texts/contenteditable? If so, which
> of these actions would you typically want to display in a word processor
> type app?
>
> On 24 Oct 2017 2:46 pm, "Dave Tapuska" <dtapuska@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to talk about inputmode
>> <https://cdn.rawgit.com/dtapuska/inputmode/HEAD/index.html> and
>> inputmode-action
>> <https://cdn.rawgit.com/dtapuska/action-hint/HEAD/index.html>. These
>> were blocked in the specification phase by Mozilla because they wanted to
>> re-spec contenteditable. I don't believe what we can wait around for that
>> to happen.
>>
>> dave.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Johannes, that would be good. When the agenda is more complete,
>>> I'll ping Ryosuke.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24/10/2017 10:23, Johannes Wilm wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Leonie,
>>>> I waited to see if we get clarity on whether the opinion paper posted
>>>> by Alexandre represents the official Chromium view, as that would change
>>>> what we need to talk about quite fundamentally.
>>>>
>>>> The last email makes it sound as if we are not going to get this
>>>> clarification. So I'll put all Alexandre's proposed action items on the
>>>> agenda but also beforeinput level 2. Then we'll see how to continue.
>>>>
>>>> Notice that a lot seems to be related to the selection so we should
>>>> make sure Ryosuke is involved in this.
>>>>
>>>> On 24 Oct 2017 10:54 am, "Léonie Watson" <tink@tink.uk <mailto:
>>>> tink@tink.uk>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Johannes, Gary, & Grisha,
>>>>
>>>>     I need your help to put the agenda together for the Editing TF
>>>>     meeting at TPAC [1].
>>>>
>>>>     We have the meeting with APA WG at 2pm, and I've added the Clipboard
>>>>     API items requested by Gary at 3pm (though feel free to move it).
>>>>
>>>>     Can you fill in the rest of the items and/or post them to this
>>>>     thread, and I'll add them to the agenda?
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>     [1] https://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/issues/93
>>>>     <https://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/issues/93>
>>>>     --     @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk <http://tink.uk>
>>>> carpe diem
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk carpe diem
>>>
>>>
>>