- From: David Young <dyoung@pobox.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 12:43:07 -0600
- To: public-editing-tf@w3.org
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 07:40:03PM +0100, Johannes Wilm wrote: > thickness, color and backgroundColor are the values used in the browser > code for markers. I didn't see foreground color. So unless there is some > other code somewhere else that I haven't seen, those three properties seem > to cover everything browsers need to do for IME marking as of November > 2015. :) My thinking is, "Is this 'marker' some new DOM entity?" and "Who knows what marker properties tomorrow will bring." > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 7:18 PM, David Young <dyoung@pobox.com> wrote: > > What if, instead, there was an API > > function that returned the CSS property-value pairs for a composition > > candidate---getCompositionStyle()? The the editor could apply the > > style, modify it, or ignore it, according to the author's preference. > > Well, first of all it is really hard for us to underline part of a text > node using only CSS. Seems like an editor can enclose the range in a <span> styled 'text-decoration: underline'? > Secondly, we often run into security issues. I think the problem you're concerned about is browser fingerprinting? Couldn't you also use timing of addCompositionMarker() to fingerprint? Can't you render HTML to a Canvas, serialize the Canvas, and look for the signature of an IME marker in it? I suspect that there's an infinite regress of issues here, and we're going to be stuck if we have to quiet every security concern before we've built a single satisfactory editor. Thinking more about privacy in this context: won't the editor content itself going to be *quite* revealing about the user/browser identity? Furthermore, even from the timing between editing events, you could probably tell a great deal about a user. Why, some of us have keyboard "tics" (think "head scratching" or "beard stroking," only your hands are idling fiddling with the keyboard/cursor/editor) that would quickly identify us, even if timing information was unavailable to JavaScript. (Is there any way for the paranoid to withhold a timebase from JavaScript?) Dave -- David Young dyoung@pobox.com Urbana, IL (217) 721-9981
Received on Saturday, 7 November 2015 18:43:34 UTC