- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 08:59:13 -0400
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- CC: Johannes Wilm <johannes@fiduswriter.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, "public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, Xiaoqian Wu <xiaoqian@w3.org>
On 5/26/15 8:49 AM, Florian Rivoal wrote: >> On 26 May 2015, at 14:09, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 5/22/15 1:31 PM, Johannes Wilm wrote: >>> I personally don't have any license preference. But it would be preferable if it could all be under the same license so the terms are clear. Also, it should be whatever is the standard for the w3c. >> I presume work on the four documents Ben started (inputEvents.html and the 3 contentEditable*.html specs) will be continued so I just changed those documents to use the ED template and that automagically gives them the `standard` w3c copyright. > This is the right URL to be looking at these, right: > https://w3c.github.io/editing-explainer/input-events.html > https://w3c.github.io/editing-explainer/contentEditable.html > https://w3c.github.io/editing-explainer/contentEditableTrue.html > https://w3c.github.io/editing-explainer/contentEditableTyping.html > > If so, refspec seems to be failing to load for some reason, as I'm getting completely unstyled documents. Yes, those are the 4 documents I was talking about and they should all now load properly (if they do not, please let me know). -Thanks, AB
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2015 12:59:23 UTC