- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 12:34:00 +0200
- To: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
- Cc: Johannes Wilm <johannes@fiduswriter.org>, Xiaoqian Wu <xiaoqian@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, "public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>
> On 25 May 2015, at 12:31, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> wrote: > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Johannes Wilm <johannes@fiduswriter.org> wrote: >> I have copied the old editing spec twice: Once as a document documenting >> historic behavior, and once as a draft specification of execCommand with the >> parts about selection removed. Both documents likely need more cleanup over >> time. > > The editing spec was never implemented as-is and doesn't document > historical behavior, so you can probably remove that version. More to > the point, there *is* no historical behavior, because browsers have > very poor interoperability here. Can't we use the test suite that comes with the spec to determine which parts of it are interoperable, keep that, and decide on individual parts of the rest whether this is something that should be dropped, tweaked, or actually implemented? Or is there no (sufficient) test suite for that? - Florian
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2015 10:34:25 UTC