That makes sense. People do responsive design to more easily move across
devices. That should include input.
Rich Schwerdtfeger
From: Ben Peters <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>
To: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>
Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, "White, Jason J"
<jjwhite@ets.org>, "chaals@yandex-team.ru"
<chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "Olli Pettay" <olli@pettay.fi>,
"public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>,
"public-indie-ui@w3.org" <public-indie-ui@w3.org>, Travis
Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, "Edward O'Connor"
<eoconnor@apple.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: 12/08/2014 07:15 PM
Subject: RE: Need Agreement on Terminology
I look at The Spec Formerly Known as the Intentions Explainer as the birth
of a new design pattern, which I hereby dub Responsive Input :-). It is the
corollary to Responsive Layout in that it is meant to work regardless of
locale, device, or modality. How does everyone feel about calling them
Responsive Input Events?
Let there be Responsive Design!
Ben
From: Ryosuke Niwa [mailto:rniwa@apple.com]
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 4:09 PM
To: Ben Peters
Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger; White, Jason J; chaals@yandex-team.ru; Olli
Pettay; public-editing-tf@w3.org; public-indie-ui@w3.org; Travis Leithead;
Edward O'Connor; Maciej Stachowiak
Subject: Re: Need Agreement on Terminology
Can we just adopt the term “action” in replace of “intention”?
