- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:19:59 +0100
- To: public-earl10-comments@w3.org
This is feedback on a Last Call Working Draft: Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema W3C Working Draft 10 May 2011 http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-EARL10-Schema-20110510/ What is the relationship between EARL and TAP and xUnit XML? http://testanything.org/wiki/index.php/TAP_at_IETF:_Draft_Standard http://somethingaboutorange.com/mrl/projects/nose/1.0.0/plugins/xunit.html Does EARL replicate their efforts? Do their efforts replicate EARL? Why do TAP and xUnit XML have things that EARL doesn't? Has there been any contact between the groups of people working on each of these three? Are there other languages which may have a similar bearing on EARL? Why wasn't this covered in the Requirements for the Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 document?* Compare Bug 024. * Current version: Requirements for the Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 W3C Working Draft 29 October 2009 http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-EARL10-Requirements-20091029/ The document says to “send comments on this Requirements for Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 document by 30 November 2009”. But it's just a Working Draft, not a NOTE, and it's not even in Last Call. -- Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 17:45:40 UTC