- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:52:32 +0100
- To: public-earl10-comments@w3.org
This is feedback on a Last Call Working Draft: Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema W3C Working Draft 10 May 2011 http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-EARL10-Schema-20110510/ Peculiarly, the defined terms aren't linked to the URIs. In other words, take the following URI: http://www.w3.org/ns/earl#Assertion This is ostensibly defined by § 2.1. Assertion Class: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-EARL10-Schema-20110510/#Assertion But there is nothing in the RDF schema which links the term to the specification, and there is nothing in the specification which states that the documentation in § 2.1 defines the EARL vocabulary term in the RDF schema. There is no paper trail, in other words, to check the definitions in either direction. -- Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 16:53:00 UTC